Talk:Bravo Detachment 90

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bravo Detachment 90 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 August 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Indonesia Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Southeast Asia Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force

Speedy Deletion

Dont make me laugh!!! : )

There are TWO LINES of text and although similar to source material, it has been changed. (Archangel1 (talk) 13:55, 19 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Barely, and the copy/paste is very obvious. Copyright infringement is not limited to lengthy sections. Taking one sentence, or two, still violates WP:COPYVIO, particularly when it is the entire content of the article. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 13:59, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK then, so how do you look at source material which is limited availabilty without have some similarities in the end product? I think you are being over-dramatic in this case and your Speedy Deletion notice is cracking and egg with a sledgehammer (Archangel1 (talk) 14:05, 19 August 2008 (UTC)).[reply]

If there is limited source material and all anyone can say about it is two sentences, then its a likely sign the topic isn't notable and should be deleted anyway. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 14:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It should be straightforward enough to restructure the sentences so that they're not clear cut and paste yet still convey what limited information there is.

That said I don't consider SOC.com as a reliable source in the context of Wikipedia content guidance so something more authoritative would be useful.

ALR (talk) 14:07, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you about SOC.com and that is mearly one source (Archangel1 (talk) 14:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)).[reply]

The problem with creating a page where most of the source material is not in your native tongue makes sourcing material hard. I have mearly opened up the page in thehope that those with more insight can contribute and give the piece more depth (Archangel1 (talk) 14:12, 19 August 2008 (UTC)).[reply]

Speedy declined. Text is similar, but clearly not verbatim. AKRadecki^Speaketh 15:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed page merge

I've just closed this article's AfD as keep, and the merge notice caught my eye. On finding no explanation or discussion of this here, I am removing the tag. If you would like to discuss merging it, you may re-add the tag provided that you give rationale and open discussion here. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 03:40, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Um, did you read the AfD? It was brought up there. The proposed merge was because the other article is an older article about the same group...also, that AfD really wasn't an appropriate one for a non-admin closure, considering that circumstance.-- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:46, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge it. Ominae (talk) 07:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bravo Detachment 90. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081013124353/http://www.angkasa-online.com:80/12/10/breaking/break19.htm to http://www.angkasa-online.com/12/10/breaking/break19.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]