Talk:Sarah Godlewski
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:02, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:08, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
.jpg){kind=link}
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:07, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Citations needed
[edit]There are four biographical statements in the career section where the "citation needed" tag has been applied. I think the uncited statements should be removed, pending verification. Beingafactoid (talk) 18:28, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- I went ahead and removed them. Beingafactoid (talk) 15:37, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Bio claim
[edit]The article says, "In 2015, Godlewski co-founded investment firm MaSa Impact with her husband Max Duckworth.[1][2] They first met in 2013 on a regional volunteer board of the U.S. Fund for UNICEF.[3] They have invested in agriculture, women-owned businesses, renewable energy and health care startups, including mOm Incubators, providing portable incubators for preventing neonatal complications.[4]"
The first sentence isn't substantiated by either link. There is nothing in the ABC link that says anything about MaSa. The link to Pitchbook doesn't say that she co-founded MaSa with her husband. It also isn't an RS.
The 2nd sentence about how she met her husband should go in a "personal" section.
The 3rd sentence is not supported by the link that is provided. Beingafactoid (talk) 15:47, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ "MaSa Partners Investor Profile: Portfolio & Exits | PitchBook". pitchbook.com. Retrieved 2021-06-10.
- ^ "Wisconsin Treasurer Godlewski launches US Senate bid". ABC News. Retrieved 2021-06-10.
- ^ "A Courtship for Children". UNICEF USA!. 2015-02-15. Retrieved 2021-11-28.
- ^ "CipherBio MaSa Partners Investment Information".
Continued reverts by slywriter
[edit]Slywriter has continuously used his seniority to make changes to this page while giving inaccurate or no reasoning for doing so. He deleted a relevant piece about her husband in personal life while claiming that her husband wasn’t reference in the sourced article, he absolutely was. He now has taken out a factual, neutral write-up on her controversial stock holds claiming it’s not neutral — it is, it’s just not “positive” in your perspective. If her “positive” stock holds are mentioned on this page, that’s absolutely fair game and is what wikipedia should do — paint a full picture, not a biased one. Also claims it’s not “due” which is a subjective take of theirs that doesn’t add up. Noting controversial stock holds of major candidates for US Senate who will vote on substantial legislation that effects such stock holds is extremely due and I think many would agree. Slywriter continues to come off as an editing bully rather than a person interested in objective truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6000:F000:B74C:7007:49FD:C0D:21ED (talk) 16:58, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, I see you finally took to the talk page, after Favonian had to protect the article from your ongoing edit warring. Your comment, however, does not adequately address the objections raised by various editors. "Undue" isn't "just" a subjective take; this is a BLP, and we should be careful. Drmies (talk) 15:23, 20 June 2022 (UTC)