This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
In Brian Ross's book, "The Madoff Chronicles", he talks about how "Little Rick" would go up to Spanish Harlem to score blow for the brokers/investment bankers and also marijuana for Ruth Madoff. My question: Did/does Ruth Madoff smoke cigarettes? She stayed remarkable trim all her life and is still quite trim (perhaps she is still smoking marijuana to deal with the mess), so it would make sense that she smokes. Does anybody know? If so, what brand? I haven't read all the books yet, so perhaps it is in one of those, or somebody who worked at Madoff Securities would know. Thanks in advance.Betathetapi545 (talk) 13:40, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
By including her current address, this article effectively doxes her - and potentially subjects her to harassment for her late husband's crimes. I have removed the address from the page, and strongly suggest that it not be reverted.
Steven Britton (talk) 17:33, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Scbritton @Al83tito The current revision of the article doesn't contain her address but it does specify who she lives with as of 2020, the property value, and her general location. I am personally of the opinion that the entire "Homes" section is written against the guidelines of BLP as it seems sensationalist and tabloid-esque to me. Would it not suffice to say, at the most, "Madoff has lived in several locations since the seizure of her assets in 2009 and currently resides with her former daughter-in-law in Connecticut" RookWeaver (talk) 18:26, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@RookWeaver Thank you taking the time to look into this and assess quality. I think there have indeed been attempts to channel some grievances (which is understandable) by doxing or vilifying this person (which is unacceptable in Wikipedia). It is also understandable that people could doubt that she was unaware of her husband's shenanigans. Nevertheless, wittingly or unwittingly she did benefit from the ill-gotten wealth from her husband. So it is a fair journalistic and societal line of inquiry how much wealth is she enjoying after the conviction of her husband. On that light, noting in a biographical article what kinds of homes she lived in afterwards, is of interest. It just needs to be presented neutrally and without being vindictive. Wikipedia articles of celebrities do at times note the city of their residence, as well as its value. Ruth Madoff is not a celebrity in that sense, but a person of interest related to a financial fraud scandal.
So having said all this, my take is that the "Homes" section is not a blatant attack on her, but a somewhat detailed chronicle of what kinds of homes she has been living. It might have gotten a bit close to crossing the line, without doing so. I am inclined to say that the text can remain. However, I have never seen any other biographical article with a section just for "Homes". I think it could be best merged into one of the other existing sections, maybe under "Personal Life". I of course remain open to other considerations that I have not thought of. Al83tito (talk) 16:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Al83tito That sounds fair to me. I agree that having a separate section for it is unusual and I think it makes the information unnecessarily conspicuous, more like something in a tabloid and less like a dispassionate reflection of circumstances. I can work on integrating it into "Personal life" or "Assets" if you feel this is an appropriate change. RookWeaver (talk) 16:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
