A fact from Russian occupation of Eastern Galicia (1914–1915) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 September 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
This shouldn't have been done without a discussion. Annexation is a nuetral word, versus "liberation" or "occupation." And it is accurate. During its nine month rule, Russia put in place its government, bureaucracy, schools, etc. and implemented a provincial system akin to that of other Russian provinces, etc. It wasn't just under temporary military control. Sometimes annexations don't last but they are still annexation.Faustian (talk) 03:44, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Really I just think that it is quite clear issue. Annexation means "legal incorporation of some territory into another geo-political entity" - I never read that Russia join Eastern Galicia legally. From the other side occupation means "control of a territory by a military force" - this is the case. From points of view of nuetrality I do not feel big difference, but occupation is more precise. --Ioakinf (talk) 19:25, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]