Talk:Rundetaarn

Denmark Mid‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stub?

I agree with Cimon Avaro (23rd Sept) that this article is a bit long for a 'stub'. - Ballista 06:04, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rv deletion

I've reverted a deletion with the edit summary

removing two short paragraphs copied straight from http://www.rundetaarn.dk/engelsk/frames.htm (copyright violation).

I mailed the webmaster of the homepage where the material comes from; here's my mail and the reply, in Danish, and my English translation of the reply.

My mail:

Kære postmester.

På den engelske wikipedia er nogle informationer fra jeres hjemmeside blevet tilføjet, og siden slettet med henvisning til, at det er en "copyright violation". Sletningen fremgår af følgende side, som er en sammenligning af to versioner af siden:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rundet%C3%A5rn&diff=226783592&oldid=226782956

Den slettede tekst er følgende:

The spiral walk is unique in European architecture. The 209m long spiral ramp winds 7.5 turns around the hollow core of the tower forming the only connection between the individual parts of the building complex.

The tower is the oldest functioning observatory in Europe

Er det korrekt, at denne tekst er copyright'ed, og ikke må anvendes i wikipedia, hvor den er public domain?

Reply:

Hej

Jeg kan godt forstå at du undrer dig, teksen er ikke copyrightet og det vi har på vores hjemmeside er til almen brug, bare vi nævnes, og det gør vi jo der.

Vh

Erling Poulsen

My translation of reply:

I can understand why you wonder; the text is not copyrighted and what we have on our homepage is for common use, if only we are mentioned, as we are here.

So, while the text perhaps could be better integrated into the article instead of being in a trivia section, there's no need to remove it.--Noe (talk) 22:09, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's good news. Thank you for taking the time to deal with this in a more optimal way. Hemmingsen 15:00, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable Phrase

"In Denmark, heights of buildings are often compared to the height of the Rundetårn."

Are they? I can't say I've noticed. Can we get some inputs on this? --85.81.86.44 (talk) 11:50, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Danish, and indeed I've heard heights of buildings, lengts of aeroplanes, and other things compared to Rundetårn - years ago. I don't think it's notable.--Noe (talk) 08:11, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It used to be a commonly used expression, stemming back from the days when Rundetårn was one of the tallest buildings of Copenhagen. It is notably used in Hans Christian Andersens fairytale The Tinderbox, where the largest dog have "eyes the size of Rundetårn". However I do not think it is commonly used in modern Danish anymore. --Saddhiyama (talk) 09:56, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Observatory

The article reads "The University of Copenhagen discontinued operations of the observatory in 1860 but in 1828 it was reconstructed as an observatory with access for amateur astronomers and the general public from mid-October to mid-March." There seems to me to be something wrong with the logic here. Are the dates correct? Ipigott (talk) 13:20, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling "Rundetaarn" or "Rundetårn"

I very much do not believe the aa spelling is the commonname in English, and it certainly is not in Danish. The name of the website is irrelevant as evidence since Danish webpages almost always substitute aa for å - without that having any relevance for the correctness of the spelling.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 20:42, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't talk about the domain name, but the actual content. Also Den Store Danske and Visit Copenhagen back it up. Lensi (talk) 20:54, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Rundetaarn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:29, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 19 May 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus (non-admin closure) b uidhe 21:11, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rundetaarn → Rundetårn – Per WP:COMMONNAME. Yes, Rundetaarn is the official spelling, but not really used in everyday life. The lead should instead note the official spelling in the first paragraph. ― Hebsen (talk) 14:04, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME, but I agree the lead of the article should probably be updated to represent the title of the page.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:28, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.