Talk:Rumors (Lindsay Lohan song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Till (talk · contribs) 10:22, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was released as the first single from the album --> so lead single?
Fixed - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The lead and "background/composition" section state that it derives from the "teen pop" genre although the Infobox does not.
Fixed - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
critics --> music critics
Fixed - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It received mixed reviews from critics, who deemed it as infectious, yet unnecessary. --> Did some critics call it infectious and unnecessary? Or did some call it infectious, while others called it unnecessary?
Fixed - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
An accompanying music video was directed by Jake Nava and features Lohan in several scenes dancing in club like surroundings and running from the paparazzi, emphasizing the song's theme. --> Something annoys me here. It seems hard to digest.
Fixed - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New York, New York -> Distinguish from city and state please
Fixed - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The lead states that the song was released on 21 September 2004 although this is nowhere in the article (besides infobox).
Fixed - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The song received generally mixed reviews from contemporary critics. -> Start with the song's actual title, "Rumors", and again - music critics.
Fixed - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Some quotes could do with some paraphrasing
Fixed - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is worthy of mentioning that it was certified Gold by ARIA (in Australia).
Fixed - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It also charted in Sweden and Netherlands.
Fixed - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commissioned is spelt wrong.
Fixed - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There are some commas that need to be put in the music video section for a better flow.
Fixed - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Make a column for personnel.
Why is this necessary? - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Need to be separated into 2004 and 2005 peaks.
Fixed - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Make it only two columns. Three forces it for those on smaller screens.
Fixed - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
References are all fine
Thank you! :) - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Short article but good, giving time to fix the issues.

Till 10:50, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]