Talk:Rudyard Kipling (ship)

Rudyard Kipling (ship) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 6, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 1, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Rudyard Kipling's final resting place is at the bottom of the sea off the coast of Ireland?

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Shipwrecks Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

Lady Elizabeth (1879)
- Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
- Improve grammar
- Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
- Discuss desired additions -None

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Rudyard Kipling (ship) is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rudyard Kipling (ship)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ~Nerdy Science Dude 00:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing this article shortly. ~Nerdy Science Dude 00:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Any external links?.
There are a few sites that I'll add in as external links in a bit. Thanks :)--White Shadows ^{Your guess is as good as mine} 10:15, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've added two so far....--White Shadows ^{Your guess is as good as mine} 10:43, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The section heading for "External Links" needs the L decapitalized per WP:MOSHEAD. ~Nerdy Science Dude 12:58, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--White Shadows ^{Your guess is as good as mine} 21:25, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
More citations could be used overall. For example, there are only two citations in the first section, and they are in the end.
Technically everything is cited by those sources at the end of the paragraph. I'll try to see if I can add a few more in later today :)--White Shadows ^{Your guess is as good as mine} 10:15, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Stays on topic.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Looks pretty neutral to me.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
No edit warring found.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Infobox image looks good.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
There are a few things that need to be done before this article is passed, but it should be pretty easy. ~Nerdy Science Dude 02:06, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting

I saw in the GAN review that there's a possible MoS problem. The only thing I can find is that the lead should be shorter per WP:LEAD, and I made the edit. Feel free to revert. - Dank (push to talk) 21:29, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I actually missed that. Thanks Dank :)--White Shadows ^{Your guess is as good as mine} 21:36, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now that that has been fixed, I can pass this. Congratulations! ~Nerdy Science Dude 00:44, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]