Talk:Rudebox/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Rudebox. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Name of album
Please check the correct name of the album. --Red-Blue-White 22:02, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Amazon, Play, HMV and CD-Wow all say the album is called Rudebox, not Rudebox 74. This artice refers to the album as Rudebox, as does the one about the single. The picture of the album cover on this very page even just says Rudebox. So is there a reason why the article is titled Rudebox 74? Syxx 23:05, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Move page
The album was ment to be called Rudebox '74, and that's the reasson why this was the former name of this article. But in my opinion the album-article should be moved to the article Rudebox and the single moved to Rudebox (single). Anybody disagree? Otherwise i will move the pages. Pardy 15:54, 4 November 2006 (UTC).
RE: Move page
Yes. I agree. Article Rudebox and Rudebox (album) should become Rudebox (single)
Jaymzanator (talk) 17:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Bias?
There's not many reviews posted up that show how this album was largely reviled by critics. further more, NME didnt give it 8/10. they gave it 2/10. it's mostly about how great the album did, when it didnt really.
Indeed this article is clearly biased. If you have a citation from the 2/10 review please, please include it. Otherwise the NME score should probably just be removed. I will dig out a couple of other reviews and include bits too. RogMcDog 12:41, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Well the negative review that I included from Guardian Unlimited (with citation) was simply removed with no explanation by an unregistered user. The bias remains. This is a shame in what is supposed to be an encyclopedia.
Chart Trajectories
Sorry, these are against wikipedia guidelines. Refer Wikipedia:Record charts 60.234.242.196 12:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)