This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Graffiti, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to graffiti art, graffiti artists and all aspects of graffiti culture. Click Here for more information.GraffitiWikipedia:WikiProject GraffitiTemplate:WikiProject GraffitiGraffiti articles
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: I have no major concerns with the article as NP reviewer, so I am marking this reviewed. I will say that far to large a percentage of the sources are dubiously RS or well-suited to verification or notability purposes, being commercial, display, or promotional media associated with the artist, or one-off reference in clickbait-adjacent blurb content. That said, there are more than a half dozen sufficiently RS that pay the artist significant detail as either the man focus of an interview or coverage, or a major component of the piece. It is therefore reasonably up-to-snuff for purposes of WP:N. The article does lean a bit promotional in tone, but again there as well, not to an extensively bad extent..
