Talk:Coat of arms of England/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 16:18, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 16:18, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay: a bad case of wiki apathy, but I've recovered sufficiently. I've now had a quick read through of the article and it appears to be a strong GAN. I suspect that it would gain GA-status this time round without too much work. Tomorrow I will start my detailed review, but leading the WP:Lead until last.Pyrotec (talk) 21:35, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary

GA review (see here for criteria)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Well referenced.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Well referenced.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Well illustrated.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Well illustrated.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• I'm awarding this article GA-status.
• Based on its current status as a well-referenced and suitable illustrated article, I beleive that in due course it might be considered suitable for WP:FAC, but I would recommend at least one WP:PR to gain constructive comments from a number of editors.

Congratulations on acheiving GA. Pyrotec (talk) 17:01, 21 November 2010 (UTC)