Talk:Roy Morgan

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Melbourne Low‑importance

	Australia portal Roy Morgan is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

On 24 March 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Roy Morgan Research to Roy Morgan. The result of the discussion was Moved.

AfD and notability

For some reason this page was nominated for AFD. Result was overwhelming keep, strangely enough. Regards, Ben Aveling 13:21, 24 January 2006 (UTC).[reply]

The reason it was nominated was that this page appeared to be a nn, corporate vanity page offering no info apart from that available on the company's website, and no explaination as to why its notable enough to get an encyclopedia entry. AnAn 02:16, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a really big market research company with a long history that appears in the media all the time, is that not grounds for a wiki article? PeterPartyOn 14:00, 3 April 2006 (AEST)

Is it possible update the company logo to a more professional looking copy? I have not been able to figure out how to do this. A better logo is located here: http://www.roymorgan.com/~/media/Roy%20Morgan/Images/Logos/roy-morgan-logo.png Alexat401 (talk) 02:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article composition

Is it just me or does this article seem like one giant advertisement for Roy Morgan? I also note that in terms of Australian state and federal polling, Newspoll is always far more accurate with their predictions compared to the election outcome in comparison to Roy Morgan... not to slag Roy Morgan in any way but it's just what i've noticed and what others would notice if they look at the figures... Timeshift 11:46, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roy Morgan research is the currency for Print Media in Australia. This is significant as most publishers and agencies use the Roy Morgan data to spend their advertising dollars. If Roy Morgan suggest a newspaper or magazine have increased in readership the add agencies and publishers change their rates accordingly. I'm not plugging RMR but it is wikipedia worthy imo. The previous unsigned comment was added by 202.139.104.226 on 6 August 2007.

I'm going to further de-peacock the above paragraph.
Also, in the absence of sources, I'm going to rephrase the sentence "The Morgan Poll is Australia’s only independent polling company..." to "Roy Morgan Research is the only Australian–owned independent polling company..." — I'm thinking of GfK or TNS.
I'm also going to add Template:unreferenced. Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:59, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 March 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) Spekkios (talk) 19:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Roy Morgan Research → Roy Morgan (company) – Or, just Roy Morgan? The current name of the polling company is just Roy Morgan, but this is set up as a DAB page, but there's only one other true alias, which could be dealt with in a hatnote (Gramps Morgan). I could have moved it myself, but thought it best to canvass a couple of opinions as to the best solution, first. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:15, 24 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 18:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that Roy Morgan would be the appropriate article name, and to deal with "Gramps" in a hatnote. AFAIK, such a move would require an administrator. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 07:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support move to Roy Morgan as ptopic. The singer gets slightly more views, but AFAICT he is almost never referred to in RS as just "Roy Morgan". Colin M (talk) 19:20, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.