Talk:Rose Trellis (Fabergé egg)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Jewelry subpage.

Russia: Visual arts / History Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the visual arts in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.

Needs infobox

{{Infobox Fabergé egg}} like the other egg articles. — MrDolomite • Talk 04:26, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Title

Shouldn't the article's title have that accent mark over the second "e" in the word "Faberge" (similar to this article title: Fabergé egg)? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 21:21, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 14:08, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rose Trellis Faberge Egg → Rose Trellis – In line with other Fabergé eggs for which there is no other article with the same name and no disambiguation is needed, such as the Basket of Wild Flowers, Empire Nephrite, Alexander III Equestrian, and numerous others. Yaksar (let's chat) 14:09, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~Restore to Rose Trellis (Fabergé egg)~~ per rest of category. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:31, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's only the format for the eggs that require disambiguation because there is another topic at the same name as the egg's, such as Renaissance_(Fabergé_egg), Swan (Fabergé egg), or Trans-Siberian Railway (Fabergé egg). The standard for cases where no disambiguation is needed seems to not include the parenthetical disambiguation, such as Hen with Sapphire Pendant, Royal Danish, or the examples listed above. I'm not really sure why we would be using a disambiguation without other pages with the same name, although I'm happy to learn why that should be the case.--Yaksar (let's chat) 17:01, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Other pages of the same name aren't the measure of WP:DAB, other topics in article text body and how distinctive WP:CAPS are are more of an issue. In the case of plant names Lilies of the Valley (Fabergé egg) Karelian Birch (Fabergé egg) should be restored to being non-misleadingly titled. I've already restored Bay Tree (Fabergé egg) as Bay Tree, Alberta makes the WP:CAPS issue redundant.

As far as Rose Trellis, well Rose Trellis the horse who won the 1957 Hopeful Stakes is not much of a competing subject, but enough for me, it's more that the article started there. Lilies of the Valley (Fabergé egg) and Karelian Birch (Fabergé egg) more urgently need to go back, since plant names are often over-capitalized, and in the case of the first redirect to Lily of the Valley (disambiguation). In ictu oculi (talk) 18:16, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You definitely seem right on the capitalization issues, so I'd support what you're saying for eggs like Karelian Birch. But with Rose Trellis the horse doesn't even have a page, so unless or until the horse is deemed notable enough for an article, I'm not sure what the point would be.--Yaksar (let's chat) 18:35, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well I agree getting rid of the wrong "Faberge Egg" (sic) would be an advantage of move, and a hat note to Trellis (architecture) and 1957 Hopeful Stakes will cover the others, okay so Support Rose Trellis with hatnote. Lilies of the Valley (Fabergé egg) and Karelian Birch (Fabergé egg) do need to go back. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:38, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just added the hatnote.--Yaksar (let's chat) 04:12, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Danish Palaces (Fabergé egg) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:02, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Rose Trellis (Fabergé egg).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:41, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]