Talk:Rosa DeLauro

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

Connecticut Mid‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Catholic or Atheist ?

She seems to have nothing to do with the Catholic Church and only pretend it to be, because it´s not politically correct for a politician in USA to be an atheist. In fact, there´s not a single atheist in the Senate.85.244.55.98 (talk) 23:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Start a blog. GTFOkthx. 63.139.221.210 (talk) 22:44, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HR 875

Whether the concerns about HR 875 have been refuted or not, it isn't up to Wikipedia to say. There is an ongoing controversy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.11.135.246 (talk) 02:56, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is an ongoing false controversy. The e-mails continue to be forwarded but the claims made have been conclusively proven wrong. That doesn't make for "serious speculation" and "heavy dispute." I will restore the previous version, replacing any overly prejudicial language with sourced quotes (ie, "what FactCheck.org calls 'unfounded conspiracy theories'" rather than "conspiracy theories.") <eleland/talkedits> 21:12, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about Rosa DeLauro not the concerns of HR 875. The sentences "It would split the agency into an agency responsible for food safety (the Food Safety Administration) and another responsible for regulation of drugs and devices. The bill has been the subject of what FactCheck.org calls "Internet hysteria," including claims that the bill would outlaw organic farming and even backyard gardening. Numerous sources, including Food & Water Watch, have refuted these rumours, although some activists do describe the bill's "one-size-fits-all" approach as harmful to smaller producers.[2][3][4]" are irrelevant to the article's subject" This should be removed and placed in another article regarding HR 875. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.223.163.6 (talk) 15:36, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Electoral history?

She was NOT preceded by Nita Lowey. Nita Lowey was in the 18th congressional district of another state---NY

Could we get an electoral history going? I don't have access to the results of all her elections, but maybe someone else does. StanHater (talk) 03:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Rosa DeLauro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rosa DeLauro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090324075019/http://www.newstimes.com:80/danbury/ci_10601034?source=rss to http://www.newstimes.com/danbury/ci_10601034?source=rss

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:42, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Longest Serving Rep in CT history

I believe, looking at the page for the CT congressional delegation, that Rosa DeLauro has already served longer than any other CT Congressional Representative. Is it appropriate to add that and source it to the other wiki page, as it seems like well established and not controversial?

if you have a WP:RS source for it, go ahead and add it in for sure. Definitely notable. Darryl.jensen (talk) 15:15, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Rosa DeLauro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:21, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]