Talk:Romănești (winery)
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Romanesti (winery))
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
notability
[edit]The article stub does not establish the notability of this winery. Tomas e (talk) 19:28, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- if this is your first deletion query I'd recommend you read the deletion policy just to familiarize yourself with it. What I see wrong withthe article is that there is "no assertion of notability" and no sources given in it. However, before you or anyone else tags it for AfD or speedy deletion you should do some research to see if you can find if the subject is in fact notable. A lightning google search I did while writing this reply shows me that Romanesti seems to be one of Moldova's largest wineries.
- My feeling is that it should be merged and redirected to Moldovan_wine_producers (or Moldovan_wine). See WP:MERGE & WP:REDIRECT for details of these procedures and guides for them. It's best to build consensus for merges before doing them BTW, so you'd need to start a discussion on both Talk:Romanesti (winery) and Talk:Moldovan_wine_producers (or Talk:Moldovan_wine). But as it stands the content at Romanesti (winery) is not up standard and would fail the notability guideline for companies--Cailil talk 23:00, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- - - This is the reply that I got when I asked an administrator. What do others think? Chergles (talk) 14:41, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
This article, and several others on Moldovan wineries, were created in a short period of time by User:Serhio. I tagged them for WP:WINE, and added a comment similar to that above to those which only consisted of a single sentence. If an article stays a single sentence, it tends to be nominated by someone for AfD sooner or later. But this article has just been expanded by Serhio, so it will probably be spared that fate. :-) Tomas e (talk)
- Just had a fresh look at this and at least now it asserts notability. It needs sources however. even then I'd still say its a candidate for merger--Cailil talk 20:50, 11 July 2008 (UTC)