Talk:Road to Emmaus appearance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Jesus work group, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Bible

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Road and supper merge

Support making the supper a sub-article of the appearance, since the appearance has two parts, road then supper. History2007 (talk) 07:02, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that an Oppose? Johnbod (talk) 12:44, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No I think the merger is eventually inevitable, but it will not make sense to have teh tile of supper, because the road appearance includes the supper. Here is teh prototype of the merged page. merged prototype History2007 (talk) 17:52, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have very strong views on merging the subjects, but I think the art and the theology (if any) should be kept together, whether in one article or two. Johnbod (talk) 12:44, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you have no strong views, and given that there are no other comments, I beefed up the merged version with more artistic text and images, and in a day or so will make that the public version unless you have further comments. You can edit that merged version for artistic content anyway. History2007 (talk) 12:20, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support, with Road to Emmaus as the final title. The merged version will have to be edited (some material from artistic renditions should be moved to biblical account), but I think it looks fine. That sort of merging is the way to go. Good work! St Anselm (talk) 13:24, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and now that you are here, please feel free to edit the merged version, so we just get it right and move on to the next episode. On that note, please see the discussion on Talk:On the Road to Emmaus about titles and redirects anyway. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 13:29, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

why these authorities?

This article reads like a 3rd year essay. Why these authorities? --142.163.195.48 (talk) 13:49, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]