Talk:River Trym/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 09:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 09:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay. I selected two short candidates (WP:GANs), assuming that I could do them both quickly - this assumption proved to be unfounded. Pyrotec (talk) 19:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Overall summary
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I'm awarding this short article GA status, as it appears to be compliant in full with WP:WIAGA. Pyrotec (talk) 19:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC)