Talk:River Orwell

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

This article's only reference is from a source that is a near verbatim version of the Wikipedia article on George Orwell. Should a different source be used? Spinnick597 01:22, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding another source. Spinnick597 00:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the statement that Orwell changed his name simply because of his "love for the river" is a gross oversimplification. Helios Entity 2 (talk) 04:24, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Swimming section

I have just reverted to a previous version of the "swimming" section as the information contained was unsourced with far too much emphasis on the events described. 25% of the article should not be about something that was not reported anywhere at all.

I am actually of the opinion that the swimming section should be removed entirely. The River Orwell is not an internationally famous river and comparable articles make no mention at all of the first person to swim across it. Additionally, in the absence of any source saying so, we have no way of knowing that this actually was the first time the river was swum across. Robinr22 (talk) 16:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the absence of any objections, and given that the material is still unsourced, I'm removing the section entirely Robinr22 (talk) 14:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well I think you're all miserable sods. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.154.2.161 (talk) 17:03, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orwell Bridge - East of Ipswich?

I'm not sure whether it was the author's intended meaning, but the article reads as though the Orwell Bridge is located just east of Ipswich. The bridge is south of Ipswich, if anything. 81.155.177.242 (talk) 18:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on River Orwell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060621134344/http://www.george-orwell.org:80/l_biography.html to http://www.george-orwell.org/l_biography.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:51, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]