Talk:Richard fitz Gilbert

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Is "Richard Fitz Gilbert" the name of a person? The article should include a description, preferably in the first sentence, something like "Richard Fitz Gilbert was a member of the peerage who lived in England in the 12th Century..." As it stands, the article just jumps into aliases and history.Michael Dorosh^Talk 00:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I put in a minor introductory sentence, with a brief definition; certainly the article still needs some clean-up. Lindsay H. 22:59, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Was the person described in the article, Richard fitz Gilbert or was he Richard fitz Baldwin, of the following generation? Richard fitz Gilbert was of he same generation as Duke Richard III of Normandy, born in 997. This would have made him fairly old for warfare in 1066. On the other hand, the description in the article seems to fit Baldwin, lord of Le Sap and Meules's third son. (RJP 12:54, 7 March 2007 (UTC)) Query answered: the name does look correct as Baldwin and Richard, both Gilbert's sons were with Duke William in the invasion. Though of the same generation as Richard III, Baldwin and Richard fitz Gilbert must have been younger.(RJP 13:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

This may partially explain further. I added it to the introductory sentence: Richard fitz Gilbert (of Tonbridge), is once referred to as Richard of Clare in the Suffolk return of the Domesday Survey (c. 1086) (ed. A. Rumble, Suffolk, 2 vols (Chichester, 1986), 67 ~ 1).Mugginsx (talk) 11:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also inserted para from chronicler Gerald , hope it explains in detail who was who. Mugginsx (talk) 10:29, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lindsay: You are doing it again - following me around and editing my edits which no one else has refuted. You are going to get a reputation as a vandal if you do not stop. It will become so obvious that the administrators are not going to miss it this time.

I put back my information for the same reasons as written on the de Clare discussion page in which you challenged only my edits. I even looked up the word "progenitor" for you. Please do not start with me again. It is unkind and not up to Wiki standards. Mugginsx (talk) 19:20, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "Issue" link to daughter "Rohese de Clare" links to the wrong Rohese. Following the link to her page, she is described as the daughter of Gilbert fitz Richard de Clare (who is also listed here as issue), and Adeliza de Clermont. These are two different Roheses, one the aunt of the other. I am not (yet) a wikipedia contributor, so will not remove the link myself. 2601:644:8400:DCC0:5D3E:C714:504B:7145 (talk) 16:02, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richard fitz Gilbert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140924041120/http://domesdaymap.co.uk/place/TQ2149/betchworth/ to http://domesdaymap.co.uk/place/TQ2149/betchworth/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]