Jump to content

Talk:Resorts World Sentosa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Trapping and abusing Dolphins?

[edit]

I know they abandoned the whale shark idea but now there are reports that Resorts World Sentosa are capturing wild dolphins.

I've seen online petitions (Eg Avaaz has one called Save the Saddest Dolphins)that claim that Resorts World Sentosa traps and kills wild dolphins in a misguided attempt to "exhibit" them.

Does anyone have any info on this? I came to this page looking for information, should we have a section on alleged wildlife abuse? NZ forever (talk) 05:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may write it here yourself. Just make sure that you cite proper sources.--110.174.132.162 (talk) 23:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Resort World Sentosa.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Resort World Sentosa.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:39, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Resorts World Sentosa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:09, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Resorts World Sentosa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Resorts World Sentosa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:48, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism by advertisers

[edit]

At least three 'newcomers' who know the loopholes perfectly are trying to remove this:

==Controversial Incidents== In the early hours of 22 April 2012, Goel Adesh Kumar, a lawyer from Australia who was at the RWS casino, had a quarrel with two other patrons of the casino.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|last=Alkhatib|first=Shaffiq|date=2015-11-06|title=Manhandled by RWS security, lawyer is awarded $46,000|url=https://www.tnp.sg/news/singapore/manhandled-rws-security-lawyer-awarded-46000|access-date=2021-11-15|website=The New Paper|language=en}}</ref> After the RWS's casino's shift manager asked Goel to step aside to another room while she handled the incident. While in the side room, the casino security staff got into a scuffle twice with Goel, injuring him and wrongly detained him in the side room. Goel was subsequently released after the police was called and arrived. Goel subsequently sued RWS for wrongly detention and sought $250,000 in damages. He won the lawsuit and was awarded $45,915.74 in damages.<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{Cite web|title=RWS to pay high-roller S$37,000 for confining, manhandling him|url=https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/judge-orders-rws-pay-high-roller-confining-manhandling-him|access-date=2021-12-02|website=TODAYonline}}</ref>

For the details, visit 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#an_attack_from_a_group'.

Do not let them succeed!

--110.174.132.162 (talk) 01:47, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you understand what WP:NOTNEWS means. Please also read up WP:RIGHTINGGREATWRONGS by engaging in tendentious editing. The template can stay, however. Gaitinjammerkid (talk) 02:52, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am currently under fire. At least four puppet IP addresses are trying to put me off. Please take a look at 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#an_attack_from_a_group' again for the updates. For a long time, I have been editing articles of different types. However, those other IP addresses are all after edits related to me.--110.174.132.162 (talk) 10:27, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Discussions about the behaviour of editors belong at ANI, not here. As for the Kumar case, it looks rather undue to describe a single incident from 10 years ago as a 'controversy'. The source cited doesn't describe it as such, and no evidence is presented that there was any ongoing discussion of it, or that it was symptomatic of a wider problem. AndyTheGrump (talk) 11:54, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder why loads of much older first party advertisement news deserves to stay forever while one single piece of third party court news which is newer must be deleted immediately. Who is undue? Vandalizers are damaging this page, are you sure that their behaviour is unrelated to this page? Wikipedia does not belong to Resorts World. If I were wrong, tell me in what ways Resorts World is rightfully controlling Wikipedia. Things are getting stranger. I may not be able to drive them away, but at least I can increase the cost of the ones who have ordered the abusive advertising.--110.174.132.162 (talk) 13:08, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What is undue? (1) Using Wikipedia for advertising. (2) Using Wikipedia to pursue some sort of personal campaign against the subject of articles. The appropriate response is to rectify the advertising issue, not to try to 'counter' it through further inappropriate content. AndyTheGrump (talk) 13:10, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
1. The content is itself appropriate. The trials had lasted for years and been reported widely by the mass media for many times. 2. Are you saying that 'voluntary personal campaigns' are wrong while 'paid commercial campaigns' are right? 3. Anyway, I am unrelated to the victim of the brutal incident. No one pays me for editing here either. Two of the four IP vandalizers has been trying to accuse me of making a personal revenge. In fact, my version of the section in question is very brief. I did not think it was important enough to worth a lengthy account, but it was just to at least mention it. 'Justanothersgwikieditor' is the one who added the details. I believed his or her judgement was also reasonsble. 4. The advertisement content has been an ongoing problem. How could everyone keep ignoring that?--110.174.132.162 (talk) 13:29, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Given that you seem entirely incapable of actually staying on topic (discussions of editor behaviour DO NOT belong on article talk pages), and given that as far as I'm concerned, my recent edits have done enough to rectify the most obvious issues with the article, I'm done here. AndyTheGrump (talk) 13:39, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am not off topic. We are both logical talkers. My view is: when a group of people cause harm in different places, it is necessary to undo each of them separately first. As stated above, the vandalism by several IP users is being discussed elsewhere, too. However, you may prefer waiting for conclusive results of investigation first. Our styles differ, but both belong to proper types. You have truly made constructive changes to the article. Perhaps the recovery and removal of the section of controversies need wider and deeper discussion. I shall not try to bring that back by myself again. It does waste too much time for volunteers. Of course, I would be happy to see someone else do it.--110.174.132.162 (talk) 13:52, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

an advice for Resorts World Sentosa's marketing department

[edit]

If you are paying the professional Wikipedia writers by a piece rate, it is time for you to change the terms. Your goal has been achieved, yet more IPs become abused for this task. The toll is 5 at this moment. They are '116.87.181.45', '114.206.172.109', '218.52.201.69', '49.228.138.135' and '121.130.137.225'. They may soon start playing 'devil' themselves to keep their salary coming!--110.174.132.162 (talk) 12:47, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Resorts_World_Sentosa&oldid=1205045081"