Talk:Rejoin EU

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Candidate List

Is a list of all candidates standing for election WP:UNDUE for this article? I believe it likely is as few are notable in their own right. Mdann52 (talk) 14:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ping Cavrdg as the editor who has most recently edited the section. For reference, I've recently removed similar content from similar articles for similar reasons, happy to change to a single line with the number of candidates and a ref in to an external source listing all candidates, but seems rather spurious in an encyclopaedic article! Mdann52 (talk) 14:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added those refs because, over on 2024 United Kingdom general election, a mention had been made of Rejoin EU fielding 26 candidates and it had been reverted as unreferenced. It's probably good to have the SoPNs archived for future reference but I see the BBC has a page listing all the constituencies with links giving the candidates which is better as a secondary source. A full list of candidates is probably a bit OTT but how else can we reference the number? Cavrdg (talk) 20:08, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's a primary source here to back up that claim, and this source also supports the 26 claim (and was the one I had in mind to use instead] (I know it's a blog, but these are the same org that collate this data, so it probably is ok in this case). Mdann52 (talk) 04:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]