Talk:Red-collared widowbird/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sasata (talk · contribs) 21:12, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
I'm going to quickfail this article, as it has outstanding citation needed tags that need to be addressed (these should have been dealt with before submitting for review). I will also add several other citation needed tags; generally, every paragraph should have at least one citation from a reliable source, and care should be taken to ensure that end-of-paragraph sentences aren't left "hanging" without an inline citation. While I'm here, there are some other things that could be done to improve the article:
- the lead currently isn't a good summary of the article's contents (see WP:Lead). The second sentence in particular stands out as an overly long list of countries that should be summarized to make it more easily digestible.
- the Taxonomy section should indicate who named the species (and when), and if it has any synonyms
- article needs a "Distribution and habitat" section
- any information about the conservation status?
Have a look at some of the bird featured articles to get a better idea of what type of material to include. Sasata (talk) 21:12, 11 December 2012 (UTC)