This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
I have been making efforts over the course of 2021/03/25 and 2021/03/26 to link to this article from others, since many articles already cite the book. I believe it is fair to remove the orphan warning soon. I will fix the link rot problem as soon as I can.
IShiezai1Z (talk) 03:58, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I named the article with the dash in the title between "revolution" and "1863-1877," however most article cite the book with a comma there instead. I have been linking to this article under its current name however, so I'm not sure if changing the article name would break the links in the other articles. If someone more knowledgeable than me could resolve this without breaking the links that would be very helpful. Thank you in advance.
IShiezai1Z (talk) 03:58, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The publishing date on Amazon is listed as March 8, 1989, however some of the quotes from critics I found were from 1988. It is entirely possible that critics and academics received copies in advance of the general public, but if someone who knows how to extensively research publishing dates could verify this information, that would be helpful. Thank you.
IShiezai1Z (talk) 04:03, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]