Talk:Rave On

Move request

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Apteva (talk) 17:41, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rave On! → Rave On – No exclamation mark on the cover, and neither in the article text. The Evil IP address (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose ~~Support~~ ~~per nom and~~ Per visual evidence given by Tassedethe below. --Richhoncho (talk) 15:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The original song by Sonny West was Rave On!. See the disc Atlantic 45-1174 or here. The Buddy Holly version doesn't have the '!' and that is the one pictured, not the original. The article text should be corrected to note this. Tassedethe (talk) 17:29, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move Page

I see there is previous discussion in regards to retitling the page to suit Holly's release of the song. I agree with the reasoning, as Holly's recording is the first to receive notability; the exact same thing happened with the song "Oh, Boy!; the page was named with Holly's song, not West's original, which went by the name "All of My Love." -Disco dude rock (talk) 05:38, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 August 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move to Rave On. After over a month and a relisting, we have clear consensus that the song is primary topic for both Rave On and Rave On!. There is also a rougher but decisive consensus to do away with the exclamation point. As such, the dab page will go to Rave On (disambiguation), the song will go to Rave On, and Rave On! will be a redirect. Cúchullain ^t/c 14:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rave On! → Rave On (song) – As with "Oh, Boy!, Holly's cover is one that gained notability as a hit single, and the spelling of that version was used. Disco dude rock (talk) 20:30, 25 July 2016 (UTC) Fixed this request. wbm1058 (talk) 11:50, 11 August 2016 (UTC)--Relisting. Andrewa (talk) 13:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – This song is still the primary topic for the "Rave On" or "Rave On!" term; no need to add a parenthetical disambiguator. Looks like the OP wants to re-open the earlier debate about removing the exclamation mark in the title (about which I have no opinion), but regardless of the spelling variant chosen, there is no need to tack on "(song)". — JFG ^talk 00:35, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wondering too if the song is not the primary topic for Rave On/Rave On!. Move Rave On to Rave On (disambiguation) instead? — AjaxSmack 03:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support a move along these lines. Relisting to allow discussion of it. Andrewa (talk) 13:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'll be explicit now too. I support a move to Rave On but oppose a move to Rave On (song). — AjaxSmack 04:26, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My primary goal with the resulting move is consistency; if "Rave On" stays as it was originally written ("Rave On!"), then "Oh, Boy!" should be changed to "All Of My Love" as well. As it stands, both songs were covered and had the titles changed; one article uses the new title, one uses the old. -Disco dude rock (talk) 04:44, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Then do you (or others) support a move to Rave On as well? — AjaxSmack 04:26, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As noted in my first comment, the song is likely primary topic, and seeing arguments for removing the exclamation point, I support the move to Rave On, with a simpler hatnote too: {{Other uses}} would be enough. — JFG ^talk 07:56, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rave On. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120115215219/http://www.rollingstone.com:80/music/lists/the-500-greatest-songs-of-all-time-20110407/buddy-holly-and-the-crickets-rave-on-19691231 to http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/the-500-greatest-songs-of-all-time-20110407/buddy-holly-and-the-crickets-rave-on-19691231

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:51, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]