Talk:Ratae Corieltauvorum

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Celts Low‑importance

	Ratae Corieltauvorum is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

Is the revision of the name of the Coritani settled, or still a hypothesis on which historians are not agreed? Deipnosophista (talk) 09:04, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

→It's been settled for more than 30 years - it's Corieltauuorum, the 'hosts of the river valleys' or something close to that. Markaeologist (talk) 09:14, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ratae Corieltauvorum

in Lithuanian language it could mean Wheels (Ratai) Chariot (Karieta) Driven (Varomi) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.7.82.41 (talk) 18:03, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In Chinese, it could be "sun, he opens the sun twice, he martially cries". So what? You're also basing your "etymology" on modern Lithuanian (which isn't anything like 2000 years old) and on the plural genitive case as though it were the root: it ain't. —

Llywelyn II

22:47, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Soar

See Talk:River Soar. We should include the information about the Soar's name during this period, if it can be established. — $Llywelyn II$ 22:47, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prehistory section

Why the reference to the Trent? It's 20 miles from Leicester to the Trent. I propose something such as '... in the vicinity of St Nicholas's Church in the west side of the modern town centre'. Markaeologist (talk) 11:17, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Excavations since 1990

Due to the development of the Shires, then the High Cross, as well as the Stibbe site and others, Leicester is arguably the most-excavated Roman city that still has people living in it in Britain (obviously, it will never match Wroxeter or Silchester). The last excavations mentioned are in 1971. There's not even a map to show what areas have been excavated or where finds were located. I suggest anyone with an interest in Leicester's prehistoric or Roman archaeology starts collecting information here that can be used to improve the page. Markaeologist (talk) 11:25, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

The colloquial form of the name; 'Ratae/(Rete) Castrum' most probably had a vulgar pronunciation something akin to /lret͡se-sestru(n)/ giving the present form 'Leicester' ^{[citation needed]}. (cf. Fr/Pt le réseau/ a rede - network-hub/web/trap, En/Angl. gastro, 'restaurant'.)

- That is not sourcing your claim. Link to an online source that says that 1-Leicester was ever known as 'Ratae Castrum' and 2-Ratae Castrum was pronounced 'lret͡se-sestru(n)'. If you cannot then this is original research. I suggest you publish it in a peer-reviewed source of note (Transactions of the Leicester Archaeology and Historical Society, perhaps, or Antiquity, or Current Archaeology) and then when it has been published, we can put it in wiki which is an encyclopedia of agreed knowledge.
Markaeologist (talk) 15:25, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The latest edits do not constitute helpful additions to the page:

"Wikipedia documents topics as they are seen through reliable sources such as academic papers, and reputable books and news media. The work of editors is to summarize and balance those sources and reflect them neutrally and fairly, rather than to present novel ideas of their own. Editorial writing skills and an ability to explain and collaborate well are often more important than subject-matter expertise. Wikipedians are not themselves reliable sources, no matter who they are."

The latest revisions to the topic of the name bringing in Phoenician etymology and deleting Celtic linguistic information are a) unsourced (so not suitable for an encyclopedia) and b) irrelevant (with no discussion on why a town in Roman Britain would have a Phoenician name). Wiki is an encyclopedia not a place for original research. Markaeologist (talk) 10:45, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]