Talk:Rape and pregnancy statement controversies in the 2012 United States elections/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TotallyNotEtreo (talk · contribs) 18:19, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
This review is ongoing. If you have any suggestions or input, please feel free to let me know. TotallyNotEtreo 18:19, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Initial Checks
[edit]- Citations Needed - 0
- Cleanup Banners - 0
- Neutral - Yes, although more information on Republican point of view could be included.
- Copyright - Appears to be in good order
- Unable to quick-fail this article
Assessment of the Article
[edit]The article is well written, its prose concise and coherent. It is written largely independently, however more could be done to illustrate the Republican Party's viewpoint on Todd Akin's comments, and the following comments from Mourdock, Buchy, Rivard etc. Its 130+ sources are reliable and reputable, and none of the claims are awaiting citation. It is very broad, covering controversies from many Republican party members and affiliates, and stays on-topic very well. It also contains plenty of images and meets the condition of being free from edit wars, as per the Good Article Criteria. It is for these reasons that I am pleased to confirm that Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012 has passed my review, and is now a good article.