Talk:Ransomware/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk · contribs) 08:01, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The see also links are included in the navbox, so should not be in the see also section. If they are sufficiently relevant, consider discussing them in the prose (this is at least done for scareware).
I've done a small copyedit, found some manual of style issues and other minor issues I've fixed.
Perhaps a bit by the side of a GA review, but the way {{citation}} is being used, article titles are being shown in italics; this should only be used for the titles of works. It is probably better to use {{cite web}} or {{cite news}} for this. The other issue is the mix of ISO and regular dates, which tend to make the references look less organized.

I would ask you to look into the third point, but it is beyond the GA criteria scope so I am going to pass the article. Congratulations, Arsenikk ^(talk) 08:01, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I just made the adjustments right now for the citation format part. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:54, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]