Talk:Raining Men (Rihanna song)/GA1
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Raining Men (song)/GA1)
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk2me) 01:15, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Infobox
- Add a reference in the article that supports the year the song was recorded
- Done Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon!
- Reference 6 says that the label is Def Jam/IDJMG
- What do you want me to do?! Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon!
- Add a reference in article that supports who wrote and produced the song
- Done Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon!
- I am not sure if there is artwork, but since it is a single.
- Artwork was never released, if any.
- Lead
- "The song was solicited to urban radio on December 7, 2010, as the third United States single." – "as the third United States single" needs to be "as the third single from Loud"
- Done It was a US only single, not international, that's why US is there. Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon!
- Background and release
- Double quotes (") need to be around both indented quotes
- Done Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon!
- "...she continued, with a giggle." – Remove this because this was not part of what she said
- Done Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon!
- Critical reception
- "August Brown of theLos Angeles Times said..." – Add space between "the" and "Los"
- Done Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon!
- Charts
- No issues
- References
- Reference 3 & 4 – "Viacom" not needed as publisher
- Done Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon!
- Reference 6 – Publisher is Radio & Records
- Done Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon!
- Reference 7 – Publisher is The New York Times Company
- Done Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon!
- Reference 16 – Add "language=" parameter and put "Dutch"
- Done Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon!
Overall review
[edit]After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put this article on hold at this time. Here are the two main issues keeping this article from good article status:
- Citation of reliable sources where necessary: There are some spots where specific facts aren't supported by a reference in the article.
- Done Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon!
- Citation of reliable sources where necessary: There are some spots where specific facts aren't supported by a reference in the article.
- Major aspects: I think this article can be expanded a bit. Here is what you can do with it:
- – Since there is a little information on this song, rename the "Critical reception" section to the "Composition and critical reception" section where critics could describe the song while still reviewing it. Also, if possible, try an add an audio sample (this is not required for GA status, but it adds better clarity to the article).
- Done Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon!
- – Put in a "Credits and personnel" section in to support the claims in the infobox about the writers and producers of the song.
- Done, but it's not very big though. Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon!
- – I have researched this song and found information about a music video. Add a music video section in this article with informaton like release date, producer(s), film location, and synopsis.
- Really? That's news to me. I can't find anything. Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon!
I will give you the general seven days to address these issues and/or debate the items you believe do not affect good article status. Please indicate on each issue when you have addressed it by using the {{done}}
or {{done-t}}
template. If you have any questions or need help with something, please feel free to ask. - Rp0211 (talk2me) 05:41, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- Done/Answered all. Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 11:58, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- Since all of the issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Keep expanding this article if information becomes available. Congratulations and keep up the good work! - Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:48, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks!! Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 18:59, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- Since all of the issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Keep expanding this article if information becomes available. Congratulations and keep up the good work! - Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:48, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.