Talk:Rafael Guízar y Valencia

Untitled

Y para que chingaos hacen santo a otro viejo puto y violador de chamacos?

¿De donde sacas esa información? Hay que procurar que la información sea verídica y comprobable y no puras especulaciones--Antonio herbac 20:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Y porque no se menciona que tuvo una bronca con Marcial Maciel y que tal vez este lo enveneno?

Exactamente que quieren decir con que el cadaver estaba incorrupto pero se la habia podrido un ojo? Y como saben que habia ofrecido ese ojo y no el otro? No apestaba? Lo habian llenado de formol? Y si se le pudrio un ojo como prueba eso santidad? Donde dijo cristo que el que se le pudre un ojo a un muerto prueba su santidad? Suena a puro cuento chino...

Que hay de cierto que iba a expulsar a Marcial Maciel --su sobrino-- del seminario por maricon?

Um this is the English language Wikipedia guys. If you want to put back him being uncle of Marcial Maciel I guess you can, but X being uncle of Y is usually just trivia.--T. Anthony 20:56, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

OK, in heathen tongue, the article should discuss why Guizar was going to expel Maciel from the seminary. And where in the catholic dogma does it say that an uncorrupt cadaver prove sanctity? It is well known that if a person is poisoned with arsenic decomposition slows down.

The catholic dogma does not say that an uncorrupt corpse prove sanctity but it helps to make notorious a person; in fact St. Rafael's body was discoverd uncorrupted in 1951 or so, and more than fifty years later he was canonized, not because the uncorruption of the body, but because of the miracles of the healing of some person. The canonization procedure is quite complex and the Church doesn't canonize without a full study and trial.--Antonio herbac 17:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

what does this mean?

"He was an uncle of Marcial Maciel, the founder of the Legion of Christ, a position from which he was removed by the Holy See." The Holy See cannot change history; the lamented Fr Maciel cannot be removed from the position of being the founder of the Legion of Christ. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 04:16, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

He was removed from his position as Director General by his vatican superiors. This is well documented and was very public. To use an analogy, he was fired from his own company by the executive board. 2A04:4A43:98EF:FFD6:6142:581F:9A41:E4D7 (talk) 08:26, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

what does the noise have to do with anything?

I have no desire to defend anyone here, but what is the "new significance" that this long quotation about noise and children had as a result of Pope Benedict's actions? There is no reference here. Innuendo doesn't qualify for a Wiki article. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 04:24, 6 June 2015 (UTC) If no one disagrees, I will reduce this section. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 12:21, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Copy violation

I'm going to be very careful to be polite here but Elizium23 added a copy violation tag to this article in February. It is not clear to me however where the violation is. Nor is it clear that the issue has been followed up to draw attention to concerns and how to address. Could I kindly ask for clarification as to the issue please or directed to where the relevant discussion may be taking place. Thanks in advance. Contaldo80 (talk) 23:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

The text is copied verbatim from the KofC official website Elizium23 (talk) 00:12, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Did you follow-up with posting details of the violation on the relevant discussion board? Contaldo80 (talk) 00:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

I asked a question a little while ago and would appreciate a response. Can you point to where you followed up as you are meant to do for a copy violation or did you just tag the article with no explanation about what the initial concern was? Thanks. Contaldo80 (talk) 05:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC)