Talk:Radioresistance

Biology Mid‑importance

	Biology portal Radioresistance is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Nuclear power plants

I have removed the following from the first sentence of this article:

", such as around nuclear power plants, or near natural uranium mineral sites"

In general, there are not high levels of ionizing radiation around nuclear power plants.

Certain reglatory bodies would be VERY unhappy about that. :P

-unknownkadath

in my opinion, gray numbers for LD50 for various species are overinflated.

I.e. actual ld50/30 for goldfish is more like 7, not 20. Human LD50/60 is usually accepted as 3-4Sv. That is less than 4.5grays for sure. Egh0st (talk) 00:42, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Radioresistants

In my humble opinion, there should be a separate article describing the type of extremophile than one just describing the property - a non-extremophile can possess radioresistance, though at a lesser scale. I'm no biologist, so I can't work on said article besides a terrible stub, which I would think would be less preferable to just having this article. KieranTribe (talk) 13:56, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problem of unit conversion

Rads and roentgens are often mistaken for one another in publications, including in some scientific publications (in most cases, old publications indicate the unit of radiations in "R" = roentgens, and modern readers wrongly think that "R" means "rads"). For example, in the "Lethal radiation doses" table in the current Wikipedia article it is indicated that "Drosophila melanogaster" lethal radiation dose is 640 Grays (= 64,000 rads). However, the original publication of this research mentions 64,000 roentgens, not rads (Hassett C. C., Jenkins D. W., 1952. Use of fission products for insect control. Nucleonics, Vol. 10, p. 42-46). Similarly, in the same table it is indicated that the lethal dose for "Braconidae" is 1800 Grays, while the original research for this reference mentions 180,250 roentgens (Sullivan R., Grosch D., 1953. The radiation tolerance of an adult wasp. Nucleotics, Vol. 11, p. 21-23). I haven't checked the original publications for the other species listed on this page so others radiations might have been misreported.

In addition, it is mentioned in "Sullivan R., Grosch D., 1953. The radiation tolerance of an adult wasp. Nucleotics, Vol. 11, p. 21-23" that 100% of the irradiated insects survived 180,250 roentgens. Hence, this is not the lethal dose for this species. The "Braconidae" mentioned in this article is in fact Habrobracon hebetor. The name of the species is not directly mentioned in Sullivan et al. 1953, but a careful reading of this article and of the articles cited in this publication reveals the name of the species studied to be H. hebetor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Entomologger (talk • contribs) 23:46, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Radioresistance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060716035111/http://www.bt.cdc.gov/radiation/arsphysicianfactsheet.asp to http://www.bt.cdc.gov/radiation/arsphysicianfactsheet.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:36, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]