Talk:List of radio-controlled model aircraft kit manufacturers

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of radio-controlled model aircraft kit manufacturers article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article has been marked by User:PrincessofLlyr as spam. I am new radio controlled aircraft hobbiest would like to make a list of sites where people interested in the hobby of radio controlled planes can go to get parts to build planes or full plane kits. The objection lodged by User:PrincessofLlyr is that the page as it exists now is "unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company. How then are pages like the following acceptable? List_of_online_encyclopedias Jboulder (talk) 02:41, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the template on user talk pages only. Also, "return policy: 9 days, minus 15% restocking fee and shipping costs" is the issue. just list them out with general info.

For the record, I have no problem with the article if you provide more information. Right now, there's not a lot to work with. Unfortunately, I know absolutely nothing about radio controlled airplanes, so I can't help a lot. You could make a list of the companies or add more information about this company, such as history, profits, etc. I will help with some of the formatting if I can, but I don't have any info about it or time to research. I will replace the csd tag with a work in progress tag. However, if the article is not significantly improved soon, I will tag it again for delete. PrincessofLlyr (talk) 02:45, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your offer to assist with the creation of the new page RC Aircraft Kit Manufacturers. For the record, you flagged the page for speedy deletion 48 minutes after its creation. Please give editors a little breathing room to flesh out the intended content. Thank you for pointing out the existence of the work in progress tag. I will work for a bit longer to add more content to this page. I hope other RC plane experts will assist with this effort. Jboulder (talk) 03:14, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to have jumped on it that quickly. And thanks for your understanding. I will be watching the page and assisting when possible. I hope your experience as a Wiki editor will be much better than the way I began it. Good luck. PrincessofLlyr (talk) 03:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the beginnings of a comprehensive list of information about manufacturers. Please take a look & let me know if you agree that the content is acceptable. I will leave the Work In Progress tag to encourage others who are more expert than me to add content. Thank you for the help bringing this page to life! Jboulder (talk) 04:09, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great so far! I tried to fix the link to www.rc-airplane-world.com, but it doesn't seem to be linking properly. Not sure what's wrong with that. I may do a little research and see if I can find an experienced editor to help you. Happy editing! PrincessofLlyr (talk) 04:11, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of merits of vendors

How do I draw comparisons between various vendors of a product on Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jboulder (talk • contribs) 02:36, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's better not to basically. I can see why this article has been tagged for deletion etc. One problem is that wikipedia articles are not buying guides, Among the criteria useful in choosing a supplier of a kit is their post sales support, maybe but we are not allowed to state it. The article contains embedded links (also not allowed) that link direct to the company websites (free advertising/spam). There are actually wikipedia articles on some of these companies, HobbyZone is one that I found and is not linked in this article. Wikipedia is international, all these manufacturers appear to be from North America. 'Hanger 9' is spelt 'Hangar 9' BTW. If this article stays then it should be renamed to List of RC Aircraft Kit Manufacturers. RC articles have a hard time because no project supports them, a navbox template that I created had legitimate links to company articles chopped from it soon after creation so I gave up trying to sort it all out. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 12:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To answer your question on List of online encyclopedias you can see that all the entries link to a wikipedia article and not the company websites. In each individual article the company website will probably be linked once only in the external links section (and sometimes in the infobox) which is accepted practise (see Encarta as an example). Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 12:25, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another problem with RC articles that I have seen is that when manufacturer articles are created (and referenced correctly etc) they get nominated for deletion on notability grounds which is a shame. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 12:44, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RTF vs, Kit

The title is: List of radio-controlled model aircraft kit manufacturers

But the introduction says: This is a list of notable companies that manufacture Ready To Fly and Almost Ready to Fly airplane kits.

As used in Model Aviation magazine, for example, a "kit" is a set of pieces, before anything is attached or assembled. I can see including ARFs as kits, as they require some assembly, but RTF and kit are opposites.

So either the title or the introduction needs to be changed. David R. Ingham 05:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Ransford Ingham (talk • contribs)