Jump to content

Talk:Ewart Oakeshott

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:R. Ewart Oakeshott)

The R. Ewart Oakeshott article and this article refer to the same person. They should be merged.

Neelix (talk) 17:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for finding the duplication. Gwinva (talk) 20:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC)ot[reply]

Not groundbreaking?

[edit]

How could the article say Oakeshotts typology was not groundbreaking? It may not have been the first typology but it was certainly an extremely important one covering a much wider range of weapon types, and I believe the first to really address blade shapes and sizes.

I've edited the entry accordingly. Drifter bob (talk) 22:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ewart Oakeshott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:08, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]