Talk:Quoits

1911 EB content

QUOITS (0. Fr. coiter, quoiter, to incite), a pastime resembling the ancient discus-throwing which formed one of the five games of the Greek pentathlon (see Discus), the two main differences between the ancient and modern sports being that the quoit is ring-shaped (one surface being rounded, the other - the back - being flat) and is lighter than the discus, and its throwing is a test rather of accuracy than strength. Few traces of a game resembling quoits can be found on the continent of Europe, and its origin may be sought for on the borderland of Scotland and England. There are references to it in the Midlands dating from the beginning of the ,5th century, and it was one of the games prohibited in the reigns of Edward III. and Richard II. in favour of archery. Ascham, in his Toxophilus (1545), says that "quoiting be too vile for scholars," and in old times it was chiefly played by the working classes, who often used horseshoes for want of quoits, a custom still prevailing in country districts. According to the modern rules, slightly modified from the code drawn up in 1869, two iron or steel pins 18 yds. apart are driven into the ground, leaving i in. exposed. Each is situated in the centre of an "end," a circle of stiff clay 3 ft.

in diameter. The quoits, made of iron, may be of any weight, but are usually about 9 lb each. They must not exceed 82 in. in diameter, or be less than 31 in. in the bore, or more than 24 in. in the web. When delivering his quoit a player must stand within 4 ft. 6 in. of the centre of the end and at its side. Matches are played between teams or individuals, the object of the game being to throw the quoit as near to the pin as possible, a "ringer," i.e. a quoit actually surrounding the pin, counting two, and a quoit nearer to the pin than any of the adversary's, counting one. A match may be for any number of points, the team or player scoring that number first being the winner. In championship matches all quoits farther than 18 in. from the end, are foul and removed. All measurements are made from the middle of the pin to the nearest edge of the quoit. If one or more quoits are lapped, the one most accessible is first measured and withdrawn. All quoits on their backs are a foul. The general principle of curling, to drive the opponents' quoits away from the pin and place one's own near or on it, is followed.

Scotland, Lancashire and the Midlands are the principal centres of quoiting in Great Britain. In Scotland the game is patronized by the Curling Clubs, and this is also the case in the United States and Canada. Billy Hodson was champion of Great Britain in the middle of the r9th century, and his trip to America in the early 'sixties is of historical interest, as it resulted in two contests for the championship of the world with James McLaren of Newark, N. J., a native of Scotland, who was champion of America. One hard-fought match was won by each, the deciding one remaining unplayed. The championship of America is rewarded by the "Bell Medal," presented by the Grand National Curling Club of America.

Popularity in Edmonds, WA

As a lifelong resident of Edmonds, WA, I have never heard of the game of quoits, or of any park benches being broken in order to make quoit boxes. After consulting several friends who also live in Edmonds and have never heard of the game, I removed the statement from the article. I am curious as to who in Edmonds plays this game?24.17.77.57 06:57, 26 November 2006 (UTC) So there go away please[reply]

Voltaire

Voltaires novel Candide (1759) features children playing the game of Quoits in South America.

Ring toss

Are these games one and the same? ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:36, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't understand Obscurasky (talk) 19:24, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ring toss and Quoits. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:17, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly. Look at the picture on this article, and compare to this. However, Quoits could be a possible subset of Ring Toss, I guess. --58.174.73.169 (talk) 07:20, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

do brits actually USE the term "ring toss" at all, whether for this game or for the overall superset?

i have never once heard quoits in the US. if there are indeed distinctions between the terms, they are clearly lost on us.

"quoits" to a yank is literary/archaic -- are you saying that brits use it in the here and now?

what about canadians, australians, etc? 67.150.85.245 (talk) 06:37, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rubber Quoits Variation

In the late 60's & early 70's in South Florida for physical education we played a game with about a 6 inch diameter ribbed, rubber quoit in a setup similar to badminton. If you caught the quoit you threw it back with an upward flick of your wrist; if you didn't catch it and it fell in-bounds, you lost a point. Possibly Tenniquoits/Ring-Tennis or Tennikoit. The setup for Ring-Tennis appears to be slightly different than for Tennikoit. See http://ringtennis.blogspot.com/2009/02/ring-tennis-coming-to-your-neighborhood.html Ileanadu (talk) 03:30, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In Australian schools, this game (a version of deck-quoits) was known as Circlos. 124.189.9.57 (talk) 02:30, 4 February 2013 (UTC) Ian Ison[reply]

Coits

Quoits is another spelling of Coits ("anything thrown at a certain mark"). The word coit (and Quoit) was often used for the the ancient Greek's discus. It was with a coit that Apollo slew Hyacinth according to the ancient Greek myth. Similarly, Perseus accidentally killed Acrisius with a discus. The serial story "Candide, or, the Optimist" (1759) told of children throwing gem-encrusted coits. Coit probably from the old French "coite" meaning flat stone. "Coit" was indeed used in the 18th century to describe broad stones "whose breadth and length greatly exceeded their thickness. 98.249.185.122 (talk) 02:24, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In Central NY and Pennsylvania (at least in my experience) it is pronounced like "kwaits"Saxophobia (talk) 22:07, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Quoits.jpg Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Quoits.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Media without a source as of 29 June 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:51, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Quoits. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:08, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RE> Prevalence of Scottish clubs error.

This article contains a lot of uncited information, despite attempts by others to update it. One passage that is troubling is clearly incorrect. It states that "Scotland had around a dozen clubs". In my home town in Scotland, not a city by any standard, had three quoiting clubs. The parish to the east had at least two. To the southwest there was at least one. To the north there were at least six, and even more in Glasgow city. This all involves clubs. Considering the provincial popularity of this pass time, it is likely that several hundred clubs or more will be found if the subject is researched with effort. In the meantime, the suggestion of a dozen clubs is simply silliness. 82.43.88.129 (talk) 03:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if that’s meant to read a ‘dozen leagues’? In any case, the claim really does need a citation. Obscurasky (talk) 09:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]