Talk:Quileute

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

Ethnic groups

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Language/People Split

I really think this article should be split into Quileute people or just Quileute (for the people) and Quileute language. It seems too confusing for there to be a single article for them both. Of course, it is a stub, so maybe that explains it. --TheSlyFox 12:06, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agree.·Maunus· ·ƛ· 06:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also agree, and ideally a further one for their government. Similar needed splits are common in Native American/First Nation articles; I've made quite a few of them, i.e the splits; mostly just making two stubs nd let 'em grow from there....some growk, some don't, but it helps sort out the categories a lot....Chemakum also, as it happens, needs a similar split (they're Quileute's cousins and adoptees).Skookum1 (talk) 04:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS evolved format should be Quileute for the people, Quileute language for the language; only if there's a situation like Okanagan people is the +people needed; or in some cases where there's a big disambig potential where the single-word becomes the dsismbig page, e.g. Squamish. Anyway g'nite.Skookum1 (talk) 04:12, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Munci (talk) 17:53, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. kwami (talk) 22:02, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation?

How do you pronounce "Quileute"? Please use close-enough phonetics, not IPA. :) 99.245.92.47 (talk) 16:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. kwami (talk) 22:06, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wolves?

Okay I read Twilight and the whole series and do the people there really have a treaty with the Cullens and other vampires? And do they turn into wolves? Just wanna know:D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.255.168.69 (talk) 03:09, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*Facepalm* This damn well better be a troll or I'm losing all faith in humanity. There are no werewolves or vampires. While there may be some people with the last name Cullen, the Cullen family in Twilight is fictional, as in made up, as in not real. *Sigh* Ian.thomson (talk) 03:20, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is worth noting, however, that, as the Quileute believe themselves to be descendent from wolves (as mentioned in the article), the depiction of them as werewolves was seen by many within the tribe as highly offensive. This is a common viewpoint within the tribe to-day, though I don't know of any sources to verify this (I might look later, but if anyone else knows of any, this is probably noteworthy information). 67.183.130.113 (talk) 08:39, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The story told in the "Twilight" about the Quilette Legends was close enough to their History..

The Werewolves of the Quilette history were the actual werewolf. They turned into the big animals(werewolves) for hunt when the night starts. This was because they reached upon biggest sins and were cursed by the nature. In the real history of Quilette Tribe some of those sins include "Murder of their Own Parents". This is the reason that they were cursed and change into wolf in night. And When the day starts They are again transformed into the Humans . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Histroholic (talk • contribs) 23:17, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quileute characters in Twilight

A lot of the recent edits have been adding characters to that section. Would most of the characters be covered by just saying "the Black family, the Clearwater family, and..."...? I'd do it, but I don't want to touch stuff about Twilight. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:01, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed most of the list, it was incredibly excessive. Half of those characters are barely even in the series anyways. Andrea (talk) 17:07, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:10, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate spelling?

I used to spend a lot of my time in and around Forks, before the Twilight fans turned it into a tourist trap. I've also been down on the res a lot, and I've seen the name spelled "Quileyute" more than once. Is this merely a misspelling or an actual alternate spelling? --- cymru lass ^{(hit me up)}⁄_{(background check)} 16:54, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Upgrading Wikiproject Ratings

Thanks for everybody's contributions. I'm going to put this page on the map for Wikiproject Washington. I'm looking forward to doing some more research on the reservation this spring. Infamouse (talk) 23:33, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Chipewyan people which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:45, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Yupik peoples which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:43, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. Score one for Team Jacob. --BDD (talk) 18:40, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quileute people → Quileute – target was moved to "Quileute (tribe)" by JLippert on April 18 2007, then made into dab on Oct 2 2009 by Mdnavman, then moved to current title by Kwami on June 8 2010. This is a PRIMARYTOPIC and MOSTCOMMON issue, the people are by far the MOSTCOMMON and original/primary use of this term and WP:UNDAB needs to be observed. Skookum1 (talk) 06:37, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose until the issue is addressed properly. These should be discussed at a centralized location.

There was a discussion once on whether the ethnicity should have precedence for the name, and it was decided it shouldn't. That could be revisited. But it really should be one discussion on the principle, not thousands of separate discussions at every ethnicity in the world over whether it should be at "X", "Xs", or "X people". — kwami (talk) 12:33, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. An identified people should be the primary topic of a term absent something remarkable standing in the way. bd2412 T 02:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per the policy Wikipedia:Article titles#Use commonly recognizable names and the guideline Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ethnicities and tribes). There is no need to redo any guideline as it already supports the un-disabiguated title. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 04:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Quileute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:12, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are they still alive and real?? The werewolves

Just wanna know about them in details if anyone off you know please kindly inform 2409:4060:2E86:AAA5:E9F0:CBE1:6C4F:47DC (talk) 14:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

werewolves have always been fictional Emb27 (talk) 03:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The cold ones

Are they real too?? Like do they really live In Seattle or Europe orr Washington orr forks please kindly respond only if you have any real and meaningful information 2409:4060:2E86:AAA5:E9F0:CBE1:6C4F:47DC (talk) 14:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Twilight is fiction. Emb27 (talk) 03:39, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]