Talk:Quickplay Media
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedy deleted because... --Vrao63 (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Several pages already link to it, re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dece
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedy deleted because...it's a major player in the same space as mobiTV, which has a Wikipedia page. Here's an article in Broadcast Engineering which mentions all the efforts around powering coverage of the Super Bowl this year, including QuickPlay's service for Bell TV: http://broadcastengineering.com/news/super-bowl-xlv-coverage-features-traditional-new-media-technology/index.html--Vrao63 (talk) 16:31, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedy deleted because... --Redjoy2011 (talk) 18:22, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
While I agree the article could be enhanced, I don't think it should be deleted because the company has a noteworthy presence in the mobile video space (see independent analyst reports, subscription needed) and has been mentioned in multiple news stories (see Google news archive) (Redjoy2011 (talk))
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedy deleted because... it is mentioned as a competitor and linked on mobiTV's Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobitv--Vrao63 (talk) 20:29, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Contested deletion
[edit]I have removed the speedy deletion tag simply on procedural grounds. Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Speedy_deletion states that an article should not be speedied repeatedly, and that appears to have been the case here, more than once. Enough is enough. Please take to WP:AFD, if desired. (since a WP:PROD would likely be contested as well, or so I suspect). --Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:12, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- The only removals were drive-by utaggings by the same IP, most likely the creator. Replacing the tag doesn't strike me as being "speedied repeatedly". Hairhorn (talk) 15:46, 12 May 2011 (UTC)