Talk:Quaid-e-Azam Tourist Lodge
(Redirected from Talk:Quaid-e-Azam tourist lodge, Barsala)
 | A fact from Quaid-e-Azam Tourist Lodge appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 July 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move 15 January 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Quaid-e-Azam Tourist Lodge – not much evidence either way, but it removes unnecessary location and treats it as a proper name. No such user (talk) 13:37, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Quaid-e-Azam tourist lodge, Barsala → Quaid-e-Azam Tourist Lodge, Barsala – Moved from contested & removed RM/T(linked).
Original reasoning:
Capitalize the title as it is a notable museum/attraction. @2400:ADC1:468:400:C488:6D72:FEAA:632E
@Eejit43: (ping RM/T contester) BhamBoi (talk) 00:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Following up with original contesting reasoning: One main source, https://www.dawn.com/news/1407033, refers to it as "Barsala Tourist Lodge" and "Quaid-i-Azam Memorial Rest House", and others use "Quaid-e-Azam Memorial Hut", and others interchange capitalization. Back in 2014 when this was a DYK, it was referred to as "Barsala tourist lodge". I think we should decided on whatever the offical or most common name is, so that this page doesn't end up being moved multiple times. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 01:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Would appear to be a proper name. But what's wrong with simple Quaid-e-Azam Tourist Lodge? -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Just looking for reliable sources referring to it as that, I've had a hard time finding a definitive correct name. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 13:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.