Talk:Qinhuangdao–Shenyang passenger railway

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Transportation in China task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Trains

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Use full descriptive name of railway for the article names of railways in China

For article names of Chinese railways, the full name of the railway (i.e. both terminal cities) should always be spelled out, rather than merely the two character abbreviation. When the abbreviations are transliterated into English, essential identifying information is lost. E.g.

Xiangyu, Xianggui, Xiangpu Railways all have different “Xiang” characters;
Xianggui and Guikun Lines have different “Gui” characters;
Yiwan and Yijia Lines have different “Yi” characters;
Yiwan and Wangan Railways have different “Wan” characters;
Yuli and Yucha Railways have different “Li” characters;
Banlan and Baocheng Railways have different “Bao” characters;
Lanxin and Lanyan Lines have different “Lan” characters;
Jiaoji, and Jiaoliu Railways have different “Jiao” characters
Jiaoji and Jitong Railways have different “Ji” characters;
Jitong and Tongpu Lines have different “Tong” characters;

The list goes on and on. Many English readers may be unfamiliar with one-character abbreviations of certain Chinese cities and provinces. So Yu for Chongqing, Hu for Shanghai, Jiu for Kowloon adds to the confusion. For consistency and clarity, Wikipedia article names of Chinese railways should always feature the full names. In-article references can use abbreviated names. The only exception may be the Longhai Line, which has become a two-character word in itself. ContinentalAve (talk) 16:58, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Python eggs (talk) 20:54, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed to use full name of the city, and the abb as redirect. Matthew_hk t c 08:16, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed – conventions for understandable descriptive names are important. Matthew, please note that WP is not in the business of making up "proper names", so no need to cap things like "high-speed railway" in descriptive titles, per WP:NCCAPS. Dicklyon (talk) 19:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It just because 秦沈高速鐵路 was not understand by foreigner like you. It was a dedicated project with few dozen operating companies named after the railway. Just mobile view of wiki and Google not good to me to find primary and secondary source yet. Matthew_hk t c 21:44, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.gov.cn/fwxx/ly/2010-12/14/content_1764981.htm instead Beijing Harbin line was safely lower cap as it was composed of different railway route . Matthew_hk t c 22:17, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:38, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]