Talk:Qard al-Hasan
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Qard al-Hassan)
A fact from Qard al-Hasan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 February 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
preparing explanation for removing texts of article in the talk page
[edit]@CoolieCoolster: You removed texts referenced with reliable sources and said that they are not notable! The materials in WP need not to be notable...Rather they should be verifiable and neutral and without original research (our 3 core content policy).Saff V. (talk) 07:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- It does need to be notable in order to be included, and some of the things you added are not in a neutral point of view. CoolieCoolster (talk) 12:12, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- In your first edit summary you mentioned notability as the problem and now you say the materials are not neutral. Please avoid reverting once again, unless you can clearly say what parts are not neutral and why they are not neutral. Saff V. (talk) 06:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
clarification
[edit]@HaEr48: At the Quran and in Arbic Qard al-Hasan is written in this shape (قرض الحسنة) and according to sources this quranic concept is written to Latin as "Qard al-hasan". what is the problem?Saff V. (talk) 11:47, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Saff V. That Arabic scrips ends with the ta marbuta, which means it should end with a -a or -at sound. "Qard al-Hasan" does not end with it, which is why I'm asking for a clarification. HaEr48 (talk) 00:49, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- @HaEr48: i don't know why this word is written in Latin in this shape, Also i think @Mhhossein: can help us!Saff V. (talk) 06:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for pinging me Saff V.. As far as I know, HaEr48's concern over the "a -a or -at sound" is right. Although the current wording is used by some reliable sources, there are some sources (such as [1], [2], [3] and etc) supporting HaEr48's raised point. --Mhhossein talk 18:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)