This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
The vulnerabilities section has multiple problems and needs significant revision. Statements like "the company does not usually react to [vulnerabilities] in a rapid manner" and "The company did nothing for the users" seem inflammatory and not in line with WP:NPOV. The references cited describe significant vulnerabilities that have caused data loss and some of them are critical of the company's response to some vulnerability reports (e.g. [1]), but they do not address the issue of the company's "usual" response. Other claims made in the section are not supported by the references cited. (e.g. current text claims losses of "more than $300,000", but the linked reference ([2]) only supports "almost $260,000" in losses.) The section also needs some grammar cleanup. ToddDTaft (talk) 06:16, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
