Talk:WKQX

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WKQX article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Stations Mid‑importance

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Start comment by Electrawn 05:16, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is sad. Lets fix it.

The article needs better wikification. Formatting every single band name is not proper wikification.
Whats the frequency, kenneth? WLS-AM uses pretty templates. Lets get this article up to basics and use WLS-AM as a baseline for the rewrite.
This station has pretty deep history. See the reference on WMAQ in the article. Where are the format changes? Notable jockeys? Physical location?

Initial paragraph summary too short and not wikified.

History:

Pre-P1: Remove article in line notes when more has been researched. Expand on this: "On the FM side, WMAQ?s sister station at 101.1 generally simulcast the AM?s programming. Eventually WMAQ-FM broke away on it?s own. First as classical, a rocker, then easy listening (WJOI), an automated news format (WNIS) and by the mid 70?s, back to album rock as WKQX-FM. " - From Scott Childers Website, referenced. Lotsa meat there.

P1: Someone specific had to name it. What the heck is "adventurous" and "accessible" in radio? It seems WDAI and WXRT are the initial competitiors. Target market? What makes this station different? NBC still owned this at the time, how did that play in?

P2: People! Famous industry people. No time frame is referenced, I will marginally assume this is on station re-launch. Didn't Bob Pittman go on to launch AOL?

P3: Specific share numbers mean nothing to anyone. How do they compare against competitors, up or down? To Chicago overall? I'm learning more about other radio stations that WKQX in this paragraph. I'm also seeing uncited speculation about the industry at the time.

P4: Thank god Hot_AC has a page. "with WKQX going to Emmis, making WKQX an Emmis station." Yogi Berra wrote that. First use of nickname Q101, in article - appropriate timing? Brandmeier was at what station? Runons in the following sentences.

P5: "more of" ? Either it is or isn't. Mancow is very relevant and probably deserves a whole paragraph. Band Launching may be relevant, but without support it looks like "band dropping" which is seen severely later.

P6: Here we see the Q101 term again. No specific time frames are mentioned here, what year? What the hell is harder edged? Specifics needed, but if it turns into "band dropping," forget it.

P7: The shuffle format is relevant. Explaining the shuffle format is likely dedicated on a shuffle format page somewhere. The rest of this paragraph is serious Band Name Dropping. Name Dropping Band name dropping coming to urban dictionary soon. In the context of a history of a radio station, specific bands are largely irrelevant. DJ stunts, a dime a dozen, are largely irrelevant except when MAJOR.

P8: Well, at least we have a specific date, but the first sentence makes no sense. What is the context? Whosa did whatsa again? Back to sole alternative rocker? Sounds like a promotion ad.

P9: This is an attempt I think to explain why WKQX is different from the other stations. "We don't really shuffle, shhh" More Band Name Dropping.

The Road ahead: Serious work is needed to move this from a myspace.com music-I-like profile to a citeable, historic reference on a radio station. Perhaps an expert is needed? I would try to fill in the gaps but I'm willing to bet in the millions of listeners, someone much more knowledgeable and dedicated can pull this off. I have at least contributed a framework to put this thing on track. Good luck.

End comment by Electrawn 05:16, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In March 2005, Q101 had a promotion in which they let an iPod set to shuffle choose the playlist for a day. The experiment was so successful that, on April 1 of that year, WKQX became completely "on shuffle." Instead of focusing on new music solely, they expanded their playlist to include classic alternative rock from the 1980s and 1990s, and even 1970s artists like Sex Pistols, Bob Marley, and The Clash. It's not uncommon to hear Sinead O'Connor followed by Sublime, Tears for Fears, A Perfect Circle, or Four Non Blondes. The current tag line is "Now On Shuffle". In on-air liners, they even apologize for the hard rock excesses of the past. Notable artists that once enjoyed heavy airplay but are now considered an historical blemish on Q101's past include Limp Bizkit and Creed. In fact, a Q101 DJ recently took an on-air poll about "who sucks more," Limp Bizkit frontman Fred Durst or Creed singer Scott Stapp. However, Limp Bizkit contemporaries Linkin Park and KoRn can still be heard on the station, as well as the Creedesque Nickelback.

Comment: Was Q101 ever literally "on-shuffle"? Even during the initial promotion, it sounded like the playlist had been carefully manipulated to include a lot of the more current hits. They claimed that they had put their entire library onto an iPod (or something to that effect), but the song selections were not nearly as random as would be expected.

Also, it's important to note that Fred Durst and Scott Stapp had very visible fallings-out with their Chicago audiences. It's not like Q101 suddenly realized that their music sucked. Zagalejo 19:25, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The article looked like complete hell. I took the liberty of clarifying this mess and used the templates of other station profiles. Much of the redundant information was removed, more WMAQ stuff added, many band names were removed, and I think it reads a lot clearer. I didn't go into too much detail about Mancow, as he has his own article. If someone would like to expand a little bit further here on Mancow (who is no longer on the station), have at it.--Fightingirish 18:58, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

alternative

"WKQX 101.1 FM is a gold heavy alternative station"

I changed "alternative" to link to "Alternative rock". Although i don't get the heavy. should it be "Alternative metal".

Disambiguation link repair - You can help!--E-Bod 05:18, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shows

There should be a section with prominent shows such as Mancow and Local 101. Some of them will reference to their own articles. word. 3 million people in chicago.. lets get this one done right (Xsxex 13:43, 1 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Concerning "Lacks Importance"

Concerning the section that is tagged with "Lacks Importance" it seems as if it has something to do with the format of the station and how its changed over the years. In its status of "on shuffle" this can be seen as a direct response to digital cultures rise. In fact, the term "shuffle" comes from the digital media's ability to play "at random." This is important from the point of view of digital culture, but also it is an extention of what the station had been jonesing for from the beginning as it is named WKQX (X for experimental). Now not only is the music itself "experimental" but now with "shuffle" the format of the shows or the order of the songs is more experimental. (Xsxex 14:06, 1 July 2006 (UTC)) BetacommandBot 11:58, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nine Inch Nails leak

No mention of the playing of the leaked track from Nine Inch Nails? It trigged a big shitstorm, as I recall, and led to a period (a week? a month?) where they played the leaked song every hour, on the hour, just to thumb their noses at the label. Jouster (whisper) 20:12, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Q101 changes their image

I don't think this is as significant as past changes to be included in this article. Adding a .1 to the end of the station name on the radio doesn't seem to alter the format of radio play as much as going on shuffle did. I think this section should be deleted. Vericuester (talk) 04:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still a work in progress

It is dissapointing to see this article the way it is, but I also see the trouble in trying to fix it. There just aren't many sources regarding the history of Q101, and Q101 itself pretty much pretends that the past DJ's and formats never existed. I tried to trim out the poorly written, unsourced, and subjective parts (mentioning that a competing radio station "wussed out" and changed formats) to make it seem a little better. I hope someone can find a better history, as I know the station has been around for over 16 years, and I'm sure there is alot to say. We need sources, and we need them badly. Angryapathy (talk) 16:49, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wednesday Word

There was a hilarious incident circa late 1998 when Q101 ran a contest where if you guessed some kind of Wednesday Word or something you got to control four minutes of airtime. This one guy won and he had the station play 2 minutes of some soft 80's music (Asia I think) and for the other two minutes he read obituaries. It was perhaps the best moment in radio history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.205.221.8 (talk) 19:48, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

End of era

At this point, which is about 0100 CDT, there's no more argument about the station's demise in the incarnation. As of midnight, the on-air talent was not able to use the former call letters, and they've officially ended the Q101 era with "Friday I'm In Love" by The Cure, which was the same song they opened the alternative era with. Regardless of whether the frequency is still broadcasting at this point in time, it's no longer WKQX. Can we please stop revert wars over the status of the channel ("is" vs "was" in the first para?) D.valued (talk) 06:12, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Even without "Q101," it's still WKQX...I guess that could change, but those are still the call letters right now. Tim D (talk) 06:28, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Circling the corpse

Always so much activity when something/someone passes on to the hereafter. Wikipedians can be such ghouls! :) --Fightingirish (talk) 06:15, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if nothing else, Wikipedians are expeditious folks :) Tim D (talk) 06:35, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was procedural close. These requests have caused confusion; please open a multimove. --BDD (talk) 19:47, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WIQI → WKQX (FM) – The call sign for WIQI was changed to WKQX on 1/16/2014. (A move to simply "WKQX" is also acceptable.) Darrel M (talk) 00:37, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is a disjoint multimove, there's a separate move request at talk:WKQX (FM) -- 70.50.148.122 (talk) 02:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment WKQX is a disambiguation page, and you haven't provided any reasoning why it hsould be displaced. -- 70.50.148.122 (talk) 02:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please put the two moves on one page. I am confused what is going on.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:33, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wouldn't it be easier to move WIQI to WKQX-FM instead? That way, the current WKQX (FM) article can be moved to WIQI, and WKQX (FM) can be redirected to WKQX-FM. "WKQX" itself means multiple things right now, especially with WKQX-FM 101.1, WKQX Channel 6, and the intellectual property of WKQX between 1992 and 2011 that is still functioning as a separate entity. 76.190.233.196 (talk) 18:43, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

history-merges Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:31, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed

"Not needed" is not a sufficient edit summary reason for a deletion. The entire article is "not needed." But we don't delete it. --2603:7000:2143:8500:25BE:7748:3D03:DBA8 (talk) 19:31, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]