This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Heat transfer via relativistic neutrons should still comply with the second law of thermodynamics. The neutrons released by fission have a (large) amount of kinetic energy, and fly off in random directions. They interact with the propellant by means of exchanging kinetic energy with it. The neutrons aren't converted into anything. Once the nucleons of propellant are all moving randomly around with the same momentum as the neutrons, shouldn't they be at equilibrium? Isn't average kinetic energy the definition of temperature? How are the neutrons exempt from the second law of thermodynamics?
With an average neutron speed of about 20,000 km/s, I will admit that the chances this becomes a limiting factor in an engine is pretty slim, but I still think saying it's unconstrained by the second law gives the wrong impression. The neutrons and the fuel both exchange heat in the same way, it's just that the neutrons are much hotter and more mobile. Felix Bardner (talk) 13:17, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]