Talk:Pu'er tea

Article Revamp

Based on the "To Do" list below, I've revamped the article, incorporating previous information and including much, much more information about the tea and reorganizing the topics more comprehensively. I've added regions, factories, a dissection of a cake, and lots of characters and pinyin. My pinyin may not be 100% correctly formulated (I don't know Chinese tone-shifting rules), and I welcome any changes by those with this knowledge. --Bearsbearsbears 08:30, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Necessary Sections / To Do List

1. Can we create a disambiguation page that would redirect "Pu'er" to "Pu-erh"? Or, better yet, considering that "pu'er" is the pinyin form, and this tea is from the mainland, rename this post entirely to "Pu'er Tea"? I don't mean to approach political issues regarding Wades-Giles and Pinyin, only to reflect the heritage of the tea. 2. It would be helpful to include Chinese characters wherever possible for names of places and concepts in pu'er, most helpful to include both simplified & traditional.

3. There are a lot of issues to cover about this tea that need flushing out, as this is a complex tea:

a) Pedigree by factory, tea mountain/region, year, and season: any understanding or even introduction to pu'er has to approach the idea of the factory (wine analogy: bottling company), tea mountain/region (vineyard/grape region), year (vintage), and season (spring pu'er, autumn pu'er, summer pu'er, are usually valued in that order, with an occasional strange winter production)

b) Tea Mountains and Regions: what are some of the major regions (Bulang, Bangwei, Nannuo, Banzhang, Lincang, Simao, Snow Mountain, Menghai, Mengsa, Yiwu, etc.), and hopefully some information about them.

c) Pu'er shapes: What are they, their history, their benefits for aging.

d) The Marketplace/Trends: Taiwanese businessmen who are pu'er fans forming small-batch operations; lots of fakes of new and old teas in the marketplace, particularly for aged tea, and particularly online; pu'er in the news, maybe?

e) Pictures! I have quite a few, but could use some help posting them.

f) Anatomy of a cake: neifei, neipiao, etc. (something akin to what's available on Hou De Asian Art but with more information)

g) Aging: what are ideal conditions for aging, what changes does aging bring about, etc. There is very little information about this process in English, so I suspect that no more than a cursory review of this information could be constructed.

h) Recipes - deciphering a recipe code. Bearsbearsbears 22:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Great additions Bears! I can respond to a couple of your questions.

1) I've created the disambiguation page and a couple of other articles, one of which redirects here (Pu'er (tea)).

e) I can help you with pictures if you'd like to message me. Otherwise, there there are two guides which may be of use. The first guide helps you upload images. The second guide helps you place the uploaded images into the article.

Thanks for the help with the article, Scott5834 07:54, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Random stuff

The following line is removed. The facts are flawed. Over this time it acquires an earthy flavor due to the layer of mold that develops on the leaves (or tea brick if they are compressed). -- sltan

This article is completely lacking in sources and citations. Of particular concern for me is the line "Pu-erh tea has been subject to a number of health studies. A number of medical studies have substantiated claims that the tea helps reduce cholesterol levels and saturated fats in humans, and that it might also assist in weight loss." Is there any evidence for this? Or is it something that the manufacturers and marketeers would like to have us believe?

Pur-Erh should be classified under green tea. --sltan

I have found many references to the presence of mold in at least some varieties of Pu-Erh tea, so I have restored language in the article that mentions it (along with the fermentation and earthy flavor that are characteristic of this tea). Dr.frog 23:28, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Please post the references, it would be interesting. --Iateasquirrel 22:39, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Well, it doesn't matter, since the author that wrote "Judging quality" has clear the dust. Actually, the "special quality Pur-Er with mold" are merely myth created by unscrupulous traders to sell the inferior products.--Sltan 18:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks ;) But I'm not sure most of the "dust" has cleared. First, aging and ripening of most pu-erhs do require the presence of some mold species (A. niger). Second, a slightly moldy tea does make the tea taste smoother, as such some collectors (though less so now) will promote their growth by storing their tea in damp environments. Sjschen 02:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

It is not encourage to consume molded tea. Whether from the view of tea maker or food scientist, it is a dangerous and discourage practice. It is known that dangerous mold will growth whenever the condition is permitted. Due to mineral and nutrient contain in tea leaves, there is no way for one to make sure only Aspergillus niger growth on the tea, but also other harmful mold(which can cause cancer or other illness). --Sltan 14:18, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Mold can generate a host of crazy compounds being the chemical factories that they are, and no doubt some are bad for you. Still our bodies have evolved certain things to defend against stuff like that, and assuming we don't drink too much of it, it's really not that "bad". As for whether faster or slower fermentation produce less or more of the bad stuff I don't know. Besides, the same process also occurs whether in aged raw dry-stored teas or ripened teas, with all kinds of molds working on the teas. They have the same things in French cheeses if you know what I mean. Sjschen 15:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Rinsing (part of the drinking ceremony) will remove surface contaminants. No mention is made of this in the article. For a few seconds the tea is washed with boiling water and the result discarded. The second and subsequent infusions are then consumed. The rinse water is unpleasant tasting (I tried it, being skeptical). 24.7.14.141 (talk) 15:24, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The Ninth infusion of 102 year olf Pu-erh tea seems to taste a bit like a dancer previously dancing on the tip of the tongue(in the infusion#8) has become a wallflower of sorts on the sides of the tongue.-By: Cafe Soihtu,Helsinki 21:50, 8 September 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.197.238.82 (talk)

Black teas...

The problem with saying that puer cannot be processed from black tea is a confusion of terms. There are three main classifications of tea: Red, Black and Green. All teas begin as green teas, and can be adulterated to become black or red.

Red tea is what we call "Black Tea" in the west. It is tea that is partially fermented. True Black teas are processed in more intense ways, and Oolong is one of the black teas.

Pu'er tea can fall into two categories: Fermented Green Tea, (生茶）Sheng Cha and Black (processed,not red) tea, （熟饼）Shu Bing - this type of pu'er is less valuable as it has been adulterated to accelerate the natural aging process.

There is a third kind of Pu'er, known as 青毛 Qingmao or green hairs. These are the fresh leaves of what will eventually become real pu'er after a few years.

There are a few things that need addressing in this article: Pu'er is in no way related to Oolong tea The chemical aging process is more complex than mere mold or fermentation, and not fully understood. The initial processing is to wash and trample the leaves, then allow them to dry in indirect sunlight. The old caravans would soak the tea again in cold water to fit their mule packs better, and then the tea would pass through several altitudes and climate zones on the way to Canton (Guangdong). True Pu'er is never heated, but stored in underground cellars to age naturally.

I'll try and add something to the article when I can get something more solid. Regards, Jeff Crosby

Fermented vs. cultured.

Is the process that changes Green Tea to Pu-Erh best described as fermentation? My understanding of the process is that the tea is cultured -- more like milk into yogurt, than grapes into wine. Isn't "fermentation" the conversion of sugar into alcohol and carbon dioxide? Perhaps it is the established term and has a wider meaning than this and I am mistaken, but I imagine most people would have this idea of fermentation as well. Perhaps a line clarifying the difference in meaning would be helpful.4.158.141.210 23:02, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

This is tricky, the dictionary using Dictionary program on GNOME gives that fermentation is simply in the wider sense organic transformation of things to new things. I think in terms of Pu-erh fermentation is correct and it is often used, also some people say oxidation as the processes apparently occur only when Pu-erh is exposed to air. Why I think using fermentation is better; because oxidation can be used in terms of Oolong and Black/Red tea and its a somewhat different process. --Iateasquirrel 02:26, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

IMHO, the word "tea fermentation" is direct translate from the Chinese language. The word is used in the Chinese tea processing for thousand of year because the people have no idea about enzyme break down due to oxidization process, thus view the process similar to fermentation. While the word "oxidization" appear to be modern scientific discovery. Books produce by expert in China has pointed it out as oxidization process.--Sltan 14:05, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Two suggestions...Three Suggestions Now

Great article. Two suggestions: 1) discuss the Cantonese style tea that is half pu'erh and half chrysanthemum flowers (called "leihua"?); and 2) make a page for the Pu'erh County that the tea is from. Badagnani 08:23, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

The combination of puerh and chrysanthemum is actually called "Jupu" 菊普(chrysanthemum-puerh), or "Gok-po" in Cantonese (same words). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MarshalN (talk • contribs) 16:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC).

New Suggestion: Can someone add a section or more clearly point out where information is regarding how to store this tea?

Cantoneese

Can the characters for the Cantonese "bolei"/"bolay"/"bonay" be added? Badagnani 10:05, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't know Cantonese, but I think those are mainly different pronunciation for the same 2 chinese characters. Sjschen 17:35, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Can we add "bonay"? I don't have any idea how they derive that pronunciation but it's used on the Foojoy package and elsewhere, I believe. Badagnani 05:34, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Sure, why not? The more the merrier! Sjschen 05:40, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Cantonese doesn't have its own characters, at least not strictly speaking it doesn't. The characters for puerh are exactly the same, they're just pronunced differently. However, proper Cantonese pronunciation for puerh is actually "po-lei". The Foojoy romanization is off. I'm not sure if that could actually be a Minnan dialect pronunciation.MarshalN 16:17, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Ah, I see they don't block you when in HK :) I'm not sure where "bolay" comes from but it could be cantonese done using mandarin pinyin. It's not Minnan since I remember it as being pronouned "po-ee" or something. Sjschen 16:44, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

I don’t know Cantonese romanization, but using English spelling I would say it’s “bow lay” (bow as in bow tie). As for “nay” instead of “lay”, I suspect that is because a lot of Cantonese speakers don’t distinguish between “n” and “l”, eg I prononuce “you” as “lay”, but others pronounce it “nay”. Obviously this is all without indicating the tones. To get a bit technical, the “b” in Cantonese “bow lay” is unvoiced and unaspirated, the same as in “Beijing”, some romanizations use "p", it's also "p" in IPA. LDHan 06:24, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for this invaluable help. Two comments: 1. Isn't it "l" and "r" (not "l" and "n") that are used interchangeably in Asian languages? I've never heard that "l" and "n" were interchanged in Cantonese. That's very interesting. 2. The "B" in "Beijing," I think, is definitely voiced (that's why it's a "b" and not a "p"), but a bit explosive like the letter "Paw pla" ("Bpaw bpla") in Thai. Badagnani 14:15, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Merging "l" and "n" is common in a lot of southern Chinese dialects, not just just Cantonese, see Standard Cantonese and Cantonese (linguistics). The "B" in "Beijing" as pronounced in Chinese is unvoiced and unaspirated, similar to the first sound in "Paris" pronounced in French, in fact most varieties of Chinese, including putonghua, do not have voiced intitial stops/plosives, the exceptions being Wu and Xiang. "B" and "p" in pinyin are used according to its own system of romanization and do not necessarily follow the spelling conventions of English or any other language.

Actually, I might be wrong about the Cantonese pronounciation of "bolay", I’m sure I’ve heard the first sound as unvoiced and unaspirated, but when I look up the first character it’s given as pou, ie unvoiced but aspirated. Then I realised it’s the same character as pu as in putonghua, which IS unvoiced and aspirated in Cantonese. LDHan 18:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

I am a native Cantonese speaker, at least of the Hong Kong variety, and usually puerh is pronunced as "po-lay" with an aspirated initial.

It is true that sometimes P and B sounds in Cantonese are mixed, and the same can be said, to a certain degree, of L and N sounds, but more often than not one is the correct one and the other one is accepted as a substitute. They are not strictly interchangable. If you say "bo-nay" and want to talk about the tea puerh... people will look at you funny and think you have a weird accent, or simply unable to aspirate consonants. Do a survey in local dim sum restaurants and see how often you hear "po-lay" instead of "bo-lay" or "bo-nay" or "po-nay", and you'll know what I mean.MarshalN 10:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Can we get an IPA pronunciation or a generic English romanization estimate for those of us that don't know pinyin or Wade-Giles? Or a sounds-like/as-in? TIA. -kslays 19:44, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Six famous tea mountains

I've seen a couple of different versions of mountains listed as being the "six mountains". Which are you ones that we should note down? There is some interesting information about it here, but is there a more primary source for the information? Sjschen 19:47, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

I think that the second list of Six Famous Tea Mountains is erroneous and needs to be investigated. I'll check my sources and see what I can find. Xiefeilaga 05:06, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

On passing GA

Article is comprehensive, well referenced, and well organized. All images are relevant and well licensed. Good job! --Jayron 32 05:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Time for more nit-picking: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
• Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.
• Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.
• Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 6ft, use 6 ft, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 6 ft.
• Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.
• Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.
• This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.
• There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
  • arguably
  • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).
• Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: flavor (A) (British: flavour), flavour (B) (American: flavor), categorise (B) (American: categorize), ization (A) (British: isation), catalyze (A) (British: catalyse), aging (A) (British: ageing), any more (B) (American: anymore), grey (B) (American: gray), curb (A) (British: kerb), mold (A) (British: mould), mould (B) (American: mold).
• Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
  • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 28 additive terms, a bit too much.
  • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
• As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
• Please provide citations for all of the {{fact}}s.
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Sjschen 02:42, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Withering of leaves before maocha

I do not have a copy of Mr. Chan's new book, so I don't know what he says. However, it is my understanding that withering the freshly plucked leaves before the "kill-green" in the wok is NOT proper puerh processing and is NOT how they used to make things. It is one of the newer styles of making puerh that is quite controversial. Can someone tell me what exactly he said (as I don't have access to this very new book) and whether or not he says this SHOULD be how puerh is done? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MarshalN (talk • contribs) 16:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC).

I do not have the book as well, however what I wrote were taken from reading the samples pages at Houde and at Mr. Chan's picture site. From pane 3-5 here, we see "dehydration" by withering prior to "kill-green" in the wok in pane 6 and 7. It is possible that he has given additional information in the book that will state otherwise, but if that is the case, then the information given in the panes would be rather misleading. I've also read in a few sites that some sun withering is done prior to kill-green, which is why I am lead to believe that what I have read in the book pages is not entirely wrong. Do you have the sources that state that fresh tea leaves undergo kill-green directly without initial wilting? Sjschen 02:32, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Aside from other experienced tea friends -- people on Sanzui all seem to think that withering is not a good idea, as it basically makes the tea into an oolong before it gets pressed. Withering, aside from losing water content, will also mean that the tea is actually going through oxidation. Oolongs are made by letting the tea wither and oxidize over a number of hours, and then frying it, rolling, and finally drying the tea. Puerh, however, is not oolong. So that's why I'm questioning what's going on there.... perhaps the best is to caveat the withering bit with something like "this is still a controversial process that is not widely accepted as standard practice for processing puerh maocha".MarshalN 12:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes, withering without first denaturing the enzymes through kill-green (KG) causes oxidation of the leaves. But then again I've never really considered pu-erh maocha as a "pure" green tea for several reasons. First is as there is the "pile and wither" process described above that I have see being bantered around. Second, aside from panned KG, there is also sunned KG (...用日光晒干的茶，主要作为沱茶、紧茶、饼茶...) which is traditionally used (...传统普洱茶工序：杀青(生晒、锅炒)...) to make pressed pu-erh. The low temp and slow pace of this kill green method probably allows for a little but still significant amount of oxidation. Third, panned KG at lower temps are considered better, but with this process of KG, not all of the enzymes are eliminated (...度较低，叶温多在80℃以下，多酚氧化酶钝化较少...), thus "well-performed" panned KG in pu-erh only retards oxidation in the leaf to the point where the leaves can remain relatively green until it's pan dried or sun dried. This is significant, since enzymatic oxidation may be occuring even with cakes that have been pressed and completed. Finally, there is the matter of smell. To me, pu-erhs of any kind never really smells either like "vegetal" green tea or "sweet" oolong. I also remember reading somewhere that grassy or vegetal scents are not a sign of good pu-erh processing. Furthermore, there is always a hint of light floral and "buttery" nuances in the scent of my raw pu-erhs that reminds me of a certain pouchong I've had, telling me that pu-erh is not all "green". If it's does not smell green, and is not considered good to smell green, or does not look green, can this tea really be green? This being said, maybe the raw pu-erhs I have are all not too good. Maybe there is a study out there on the oxygenase activity in the processing steps of raw pu-erh, which can clear some of this up. Overall this has turned out to be more complicated then ever, and yes I agree with editing the withering part to allow for a caveat. Sjschen 22:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

But I think the key is that there is a crucial difference between the oxidation that occurs before ANY KG happens (i.e. in wilting) vs oxidation that takes place AFTER some KG has occurred (i.e. sun drying). Whereas the latter is the accepted as part of puerh production, the first variety happens much quicker (producing redness in leaves, among other things) and is said to destroy important molecules that may hinder future aging potential.MarshalN 10:22, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

In this case I may have slightly misunderstood the terminology of the processes. Assuming sun drying for for all processes and no prior processing of the fresh leaves, my understanding is that that sunned KG involves ONLY sunning the leaves (sun->knead->sun), that panned KG involves only pan heating the leaves (pan->knead->sun), and that baked KG involves only baking the leaves (bake->knead->sun). Do you mean that all forms of KG will always be in the form of panning, or artificially heating the unprocessed leaves (pan->knead->*something*) ? Before this discussion, my understanding of maocha processing from fresh leaves is sunWilt->panKG->knead->sunDry which changed to coolWilt->panKG->knead->sunDry with Mr. Chan's book pages, but now I have to say I'm sure anymore considering these different and conflicting views. It is interesting to note that in Puerh teapot mag. No15. the article describing the traditional method states that some red colour from oxidation is a feature of the traditonal method, and that it involves "cool wilting" the leaves (steps 2-3). Do you think this information is erroneous? The mag is the same publisher and images as in Mr. Chan's book. Sjschen 17:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

I believe the whole wilting business is actually a Taiwanese way of making tea in general. From what I understand, the proper way to make puerh in the traditional style is pan-cooking, kneading, and then sun drying. It should all be done quickly, rather than through a long period of time. There will always be some redness involved in this process, since there will be redness from the time the leaves were picked to the pan, if nothing else. Wilting, however, creates artificial fermentation that, from what I understand, is not desirable. Wilting, however, is an integral portion of Taiwanese tea making, and it does make the tea less bitter, more aromatic, and some say age faster. The price for this, claims skeptics, is that it doesn't age nearly as well. Who to believe? I think nobody, Taiwanese, HKers, mainlanders included, know what it takes for a good puerh to become a good puerh. We're all still learning. MarshalN 04:32, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Cantonese spelling

There are today official variants of the Pinyin spelling system for regional languages in China.

Official Cantonese language Pinyin should be used in:

"In the Cantonese language, it is known as po-lay (or bo-lay) tea."

If there is a previously established English rendering (such as "po-lay") this should also be indicated. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.6.244.110 (talk) 08:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC).

Historical "Pu-er Tea Company" with trade route to India

This article:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-2583137,00.html

mentions:

"... retracing an ancient trans-Himalayan tea route ... the 1,400-mile Tea Horse Caravan Road from Deqin in Yunnan province, southwest China, to the Tibetan capital, Lhasa ... on ... to Nepal ... a group of travellers following the ancient Pu’er Tea Company trade route, where tea has been traded for horses for more than 1,000 years ..." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.6.244.110 (talk) 08:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC).

Pu erh??

Bearsbearsbears once said: "Can we create a disambiguation page that would redirect "Pu'er" to "Pu-erh"? Or, better yet, considering that "pu'er" is the pinyin form, and this tea is from the mainland, rename this post entirely to "Pu'er Tea"?

So somebody made the article "pu erh", as requested. Bearsbearsbears in one go wants to redirect "pu er" to "pu erh", and then says "better yet", basically lets rename the whole thing "pu er". Wtf??

I believe all references that state "pu erh" need to be changed to "pu er" (as was bearsbearsbears' original request... although perhaps bears was feeling a little lightheaded when writing that).

Also, we have canto romanization in the article, so I've added pinyin. Absolutely crazy not to have it, seeing that it IS from Yunnan.

What is with "pu erh"? What's with the h? And yes, I'm aware of the risk of starting another huge war over this pinyin vs Wade Giles issue. Now just in case Wade Giles lovers like Badagnani disagree, from the word go I'll say, "I don't care" what you think. :) It's from Yunnan. It's called "pu3 er3" and that's the way it is. Not "pu erh". See the times article quoted above :)

Goodnight. Djwatson 22:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Move request

From WP:RM:

• Pu-erh tea → Pu-erh — a type of Chinese tea, "Pu-erh" redirects there and is not used in any other articles. Though I didn't see it at first or thought of it, a google search of "Pu-erh" turns up the Chinese tea[1] MUCH more than the Dragon Ball character Pu-erh[2]. I'm also using Oolong tea which redirects to Oolong as an example to this, as "tea" is uneeded in the page title. —~I'm anonymous 04:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• This survey, on my part, is over. From the looks of it, Oolong will be changed to Oolong tea for consistency with the complete tea names. ~I'm anonymous
  • It may well be called "Pu-erh" in the tea trade, but most people are likely to call it "Pu-erh tea" to show that it is a sort of tea and not a man or a place name etc. Anthony Appleyard 06:31, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

A cursory web search also seems to indicate that "Pu-erh tea" or "Pu-erh teas" is more common than "Pu-erh" alone. --Stemonitis 11:32, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose as pu-erh tea is usually referred to as such (as is Oolong BTW) and is not a pleonasm in English or Chinese (cf. most of the teas listed at Category:Chinese tea). —  AjaxSmack  02:58, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - again, why is it that "Oolong" is placed as the page title of "Oolong tea", and what makes this case so different? This is a matter I don't understand. What does a cursory web have to do with any of this? ~I'm anonymous

Nothing. I'll propose a move of Oolong so it matches the scores of other tea varieties, OK? —  AjaxSmack  05:29, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

GA Sweeps

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed.

• Lack of (or very little) references in some sections of the article, such as the investment, storage, and other sections

I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made and issues are being addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. Regards, OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 15:02, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

As there's no significant improvement to sourcing information. I'm now delisting this article. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 20:54, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Identifying Counterfeits

Just so you all know, if I can find sufficient sources, I'd like to add a section on counterfeit detection, as it could help the reader, I think. Thanks. --Isaiah 21:17, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Cleaning up References

I have been cleaning up references on a number of tea-related articles. I have found fairly heavy WP:CITESPAM on articles, mostly including blogs, self-published sites, and company sites. It's hard to say where the sloppy sourcing ends and citation spam begins, but I think that because tea is a profit-making industry, and tea company sites are selling something, and because they are self-published, we need to be extra-cautious of referencing company websites--only doing so when there is strong reason to trust the source. This fits with the guidelines on WP:RS.

I kept the sources to http://www.pu-erh.net/, because that site identifies the author by name, is old / well-established, and shows evidence of thorough research. But even that is somewhat questionable and I'd be open to discussion of removing that as a source if others are critical of it. But besides that one, I think the other self-published sites, including company sites need to go. If anyone wants to add them back, please give justification here before doing so. In general, some sort of compelling reason is necessary. I.e, per WP:SPS:

Self-published material may in some circumstances be acceptable when produced by an established expert on the topic of the article whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications. Caution should be exercised when using such sources: if the information in question is really worth reporting, someone else is likely to have done so.

Cazort (talk) 16:01, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the hard work! -- Sjschen (talk) 15:22, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

---

It is good that fellow editors are agreed on the issue of avoiding the use of commercial sites as references. I think another area worth looking at is the amount of traditionally published literature by reputable sources. We have been relying too much on the internet sometimes. Nevertheless, the current content of this article is still so much affected by marketing publicity. I shall shortly proceed to clean it up to reveal the traditional concept of pu'er that was previously agreed by academics and the trade until the recent two decades, when marketeers began to "re-construct" a "history" and a "tea character" to raise margin that fattens only the middle merchants. Please let me know your opinions and if there are any issues. Kwanchungleung (talk) 09:27, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Terminology

• Tea Studies Index
• addresses Puer (green and dark)
• raw/green Puer青普: sun fixation曬青 > rolling揉捻 > sun drying曬乾
• ripe/dark Puer熟普: sun fixation曬青 > rolling揉捻 > piling 渥堆 > sun drying曬乾

Puerh should have sun fixation and sun drying.

Added processes: green Puerh and dark Puerh can be compress into cakes and aged.

fixation曬青 is shaqing

rolling揉捻 is kneading

dark tea黑茶 is what some call "red tea", but this can cause confusion for rooibos and "black tea紅茶"

Puer/h or Pu'/-er is a place and should be capital (P)u/'/-/er/h

icetea8 (talk) 03:27, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Too much marketing content from price speculation influence

Too much of the content of this article is influenced by marketing intent for price speculation of the tea and a lot lack references of reputable sources other than the marketers' or price auction news. Formal academic contents and independent references are missing here, and yet Wikipedia has not been marking this. If there is no argument in realigning at least the introductory, origin and nature of the tea variety into a more encyclopedic accuracy, I shall go ahead and re-write this article, bit by bit, whenever I have the time, starting from tomorrow.

Kwanchungleung (talk) 10:03, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposal: Consensus and Dispute

• first issue is what is the agreed letter spelling of the term with or without the "h" puer/h.
• The name of the article is with the "H", by having the content of the article without the "H" will cause confusion.

We need to follow a common rule

Most established Chinese words used in common English don't use any punctuation in their spelling.

Punctuation capitals, and spaces can be used for pronunciation help of syllables.

If punctuation is used in common spelling, then we need to insert in all Chinese derived terms or have rules for when and why used.

Whatever we decide we should follow the rules for what we decide.

We Need Rules and Conventions

• For studying Chinese punctuation is used for tones but for English we can omit them.
• Punctuation can be used for pronunciation help. (added feb04,2010)
• Omit the punctuation, inside capital, and space for Pu-erh, Pu'er, Pu er(h), and PuEr(h), just write Puerh and Puer.

icetea8 (talk) 04:47, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

---

I think the use of the punctuation is not for study of pinyin or any other thing but rather to help the reader to pronounce the words in question a little closer to the original intended phonetic. I have problem, however, in seeing the main entry title as Pu-erh, as Pu'er is the mainstream romanization of the character. I know the word with the "h" has been in use for certain merchants for a while, but so are other names as Po Lay or Bo Lei. It is to Wiki's standard that the proper use of word should be the main entry and the others properly addressed in the content. I think I will amend the situation accordingly.

Kwanchungleung (talk) 04:00, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

i have rearranaged the proposal section.

this spelling issue needs to be solved or it will destructive to the goals of the puer(h) article and also infuence future articles. below is the "puer(h) tea types template" and it is using the "H".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_Tea/Types/Puerh icetea8 (talk) 12:47, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

to "Kwanchungleung" your edits have changed some of the "h"s not all, we need to be consistant within the article, either all "puerh" or "puer".icetea8 (talk) 15:03, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

---

Hello "icetea8", now I have standardized the "pu'er" spelling for most, do you have any idea how to amend the title and the template? Kwanchungleung (talk) 15:19, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

for changing/moving please read here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Page_move http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requested_moves icetea8 (talk) 16:15, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

máochá

this should be spelled in common English using raw tea or maocha, "á" puncuation is for Chinese. icetea8 (talk) 15:12, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

---

Hello Icetea8, I agree it should be consistent spelling "pu'er" without the "h". I shall finish my job with it. I actually want to change the title to one without an h too, but that is taken by an article without content and I have no idea how to correct the situation. Any help you can offer would be nice.

I also agree with you that maocha or better yet mao cha be spelled without the accents. However, I think "raw tea" is a very misleading English term for that expression. Maybe you have any good idea?

Kwanchungleung (talk) 14:42, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

another term for raw tea can be taken from the fact, after "Primary Tea Processes 茶葉初制" we have primary processed tea. about the spelling of Pue(')r, if you look at this tea's wrapper (do a search on google) it will usually be written without the ('). it is vital that we editors to use simple English and consistency for the good of this article, i dont want a spelling war over this tea, all that will happen is more confusion. what is the purpose of putting the ( ' )in the term ? icetea8 (talk) 15:20, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

i have removed "copyedit tag", discussion of spelling convention should be brought out here not in the article, icetea8 (talk) 15:50, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

as this part of the talk page seems to be both (a) relatively current and (b) a discussion between language experts, I place my remark here. Forgive the lack of adepter formatting and by "forgive" I mean please feel free to edit or reorganize me. Ahem. Is there some sort of w'pedia convention preventing adding a phonetic parenthetical of pu'er at the top of the entry? I came here as one having asked naively at a dinner, "what is this tea exactly?". Some expert pronunciation advice would help me pontificate my new tea-knowledge with confidence henceforth. konastephen (talk) 5:34, 1 Sept 2011 (UTC)

Added in the first sentence, Pu'er, Pu-erh, Puer, (pronounced: poo-urr or poo-air). icetea8 (talk) 13:17, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Cooked (shou) / Raw (Sheng)

I've changed the information on shou and sheng to correct a factual error in the originally cited article. I will do further research to find citations and further clarify the point. My understanding is that cooked pu-erh is stored in humid rooms to accelerate post-fermentation ripening. They become qualitatively different teas based on whether they are "cooked" or not. JonSidener (talk) 06:03, 25 May 2012 (UTC)JonSidener

The process actually involves spraying the tea with water, not just storing in humid rooms. The process is in fact highly controlled composting. I do have an issue with changing the term to "cooked", which I don't see as an accurate translation of the the term "shou". -- Sjschen (talk) 16:46, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

congratulations to editors and request for commercial value section

Great article. On a site with so many non-notable articles it is a pleasure to find an in depth treatment of an important topic. The only thing lacking as far as I can see is information on the commercial value of this tea. 66.249.80.86 (talk) 07:29, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

What is Hei Cha (黑茶) Supposed to say in English, "Black Tea" or "Dark Tea" ?

What is Hei Cha (黑茶) Supposed to say in English, "Black Tea" or "Dark Tea" ?

I talked with some specialists, it should be this:

• Hong Cha(红茶)： "Black tea"
• Hei Cha(黑茶)： "Dark tea" or “Fermented tea"

Welcome to talk with me User_talk:LisaAmy

Cantonese

Great and reliable source: http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3344 --Espoo (talk) 01:08, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Pu-erh tea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140709170824/http://www.taooftea.com:80/display.php3?id=&num=33 to http://www.taooftea.com/display.php3?id=&num=33
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140419014556/http://www.taooftea.com/display.php3?id=&num=38 to http://www.taooftea.com/display.php3?id=&num=38
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.kmorder.cn/yntc/yncy/20060831234331.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.the-art-of-tea.com/viewissue.php?url=aXNzdWVfbm89MQ==

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:06, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pu'er tea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160507081118/http://tearroir.com/news/puer-vs-pu-erh-whats-the-deal-with-the-different-spellings to http://tearroir.com/news/puer-vs-pu-erh-whats-the-deal-with-the-different-spellings

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:42, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Intro needs revising; reads as if all pu er undergoes wo dui

The intro has some points which would be correct, if this article were solely about shou pu er. The consideration of sheng as hei cha is contentious, but not the biggest offender. The intro reads as if all pu er undergoes the wo dui process, and implies that all fermentation in the context of pu er is solely related to wo dui as well (this is contradicted later in the article, where it explains the difference in how sheng ferments over time)

Personally I think it'd just be better for them to have two separate pages, but if they are destined to be under one, please consider rewriting the intro. It's not nearly misinformative as most pu er writings out there, but it's a pretty misleading summary.

My suggestion would be to introduce pu er, mention both production styles, give a minor overview of each, don't lay too hard into the contentious provenance of shou (citation sorely needed on the proposition that the sole reason it was invented was to mimic aged sheng), and leave the description of wo dui for latter portions of the article. The little overview of fermentation can be changed to indicate that both undergo fermentation, but through significantly different methods. 2601:183:200:3D30:8D1E:2446:405C:8076 (talk) 12:41, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 200 - Thu

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rheaxx666 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Rheaxx666 (talk) 18:26, 26 November 2022 (UTC)