Talk:Psychological operations (United States)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Psychological operations (United States) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Military history: North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Infobox

@Michael21107: per WP:BRD, I'm starting the discussion you should have, instead of reverting. Instead of back-n-forth edit summaries, it's preferrable to discuss the matter here. In the meantime, the page should remain at WP:QUO. So, now please explain why you're so dead-set against this infobox? Thank you - wolf 13:04, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox looks like an extremely informative summary and, in my view, it would be most unhelpful to lose it. Dormskirk (talk) 14:10, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i think its not necessary to have such infobox and may even be confusing for someone looking for a military unit Michael H 14:11, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get that. If I was looking for an article on US psychological operations, this article would meet my expectations and an infobox would simply enhance my satisfaction. Dormskirk (talk) 14:20, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from my tp

Psyop

its not Psyophelpful to have a military unit infobox on a page not about a military unit, please read my reasoning and dont just undo it, thanks Michael H 14:01, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about this issue belong on the article talk page, we don't split discussions across multiple talk pages unnecessarily. (also, the initial heading of "userbox" here was a typo, no need to have to have to different threads because of that).

As for your reasoning for removal, don't assume that people who disagree with you are only doing so out of ignorance from not reading your reasons for removal. I read them, I'm sure Dormskirk did as well. To me, it boils down to you just not liking it and I don't find that to be a compelling reason to remove a farely standard component of articles in general, and one in this case that is useful and has been with the article since it's creation seventeen years ago. - wolf 14:33, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-vaccine propaganda targeted at the Philippines

I just saw this summarized at https://youtube.com/watch?v=3f_LteS5ua8&t=685 and I think we need to say something more substantial about the extent of the harm done. 141.239.252.245 (talk) 04:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not the point of this article. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 06:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How so? 141.239.252.245 (talk) 02:13, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]