Talk:Protein kinase

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is within the scope of the Cell Signaling task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jecgecko.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

this page needs citations

There is already a "kinase" article. "protein kinase" article is redundant

You'd probably want to simply add the {{verify}} tag to the article itself. It says the following:

~GMH talk to me 22:37, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is it really true that the phosphate transfered comes from DNA? I rather thought it comming from ATP. 84.160.239.84 12:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not redundant,

I'm no expert on this topic, but the kinase article states that not all kinases are protein kinases. Either that statement is false or there's no redundancy.

There is no reference to kinase A, here, yet there is a page for it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAMP-dependent_protein_kinase

I came here looking to be sure that kinase 1 and kinase A were unrelated, not different usages. It certainly seems so, but if someone has more information on that, please do add it here. Ndaniels 17:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely concur - protein kinase is not redundant. Biochemza 18:14, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Removed the Kin3X link since that site requires registration, and after several months and attempts, I've been unable to get access. Ceolas (talk) 23:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that Protein kinase be merged into Protein phosphorylation or vice-versa, or at least properly divided and referenced. I think that the content in the Protein kinase article can easily be explained in the context of Protein phosphorylation and the Protein phosphorylation article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Protein kinase will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. 79.180.161.130 (talk) 07:39, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Protein kinase is a molecule while protein phosphorylation is a process. I think these should remain separate. Aszilagyi (talk) 14:54, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Against, "The diphosphoinositol polyphosphates serve as phosphate donors in non-enzymatic protein phosphorylation ..." Scott T. Brady et al. (bold is mine) Teaktl17 (talk) 22:02, 10 May 2015 (UTC) Also: "Non-enzymatic phosphorylation of bovine serum albumin" by Chellappa Vasant et al. Teaktl17 (talk) 22:09, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tags removed, agreement here that these should be separate. Opabinia regalis (talk) 06:52, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Receptor serine/threonine kinase" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Receptor serine/threonine kinase and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 1#Receptor serine/threonine kinase until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 06:41, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]