Talk:Project Merlin

Politics of the United Kingdom High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Taxation (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation articles

Economics High‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

What's the problem now?

There seems to be a dedicated band of Tory-supporting blankers on Wikipedia. I'm used to it from pro-Israel people, but this is new to me. What is the problem with the material? I am happy to adjust the tone of it if needs be. ~ Iloveandrea (talk) 21:46, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to be a Tory supporter to spot bias when you see it. At present the article repeatedly takes opinions and treats them as facts. It ignores the government's POV on the matter and presents it in a purely negative light.

For example, fundamental to the series of edits that I reverted is the claim that Merlin was a "failure". We can't say that like that, because it's not a fact, but merely your own opinion - which would be disputed by the government, whose project it was. If it's relevant that some described Merlin as a failure, the article can discuss that, but it must then balance this with those that disagree. Kahastok talk 08:40, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]