Talk:Predestination in Catholicism

Theology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism High‑importance

Predestination in Catholicism is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

The introduction and the body of the article seem totally at odds both in terms of tone and implied belief. I believe the first 2/3rds of the intro are more “accurate to a layperson” but it does lack any citation and stylistically clashes with the following article.

Can this be tidied up a bit? I read this entry and left more confused than I entered.

What’s up with the Intro?

The introduction and the body of the article seem totally at odds both in terms of tone and implied belief. I believe the first 2/3rds of the intro are more “accurate to a layperson” but it does lack any citation and stylistically clashes with the following article.

Can this be tidied up a bit? I read this entry and left more confused than I entered. 2601:484:C000:4A0:D96E:DA7B:7455:1F54 (talk) 07:08, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]