Talk:Conceptual proliferation
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
See Also Link
[edit]Wikipedia:ALSO With the deletion, I wonder if the editors here are interested in a perfect article. Zulu Papa 5 (talk) 14:18, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Dubious
[edit]Qualitative use of the word "dubious" is dubious almost any time, but is very clearly so here. Hardly factual or encyclopedic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Egospoon (talk • contribs) 03:21, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- Removed the ‘dubious content’ and updated the page. --Foresterr (talk) 06:31, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
I substantially edited this article. Most of the text is now mine. Please see my User page for my qualifications. I would appreciate any help, discussion, etc. as I continue to expand and edit this article. Thanks. ARRust —Preceding unsigned comment added by ARRust (talk • contribs) 20:08, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No move. Cúchullain t/c 13:48, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Conceptual proliferation → Conceptual proliferation in Buddhism (Papanca) – Seems important that "Papanca" - the topic of the article - is in the title. As it is a Pali word, I suggest to put it in bracket after the English translation of this topic, which is the mental mechanism of conceptual proliferation, as viewed in Buddhist texts and traditions. --Relisted. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:29, 1 July 2014 (UTC) Sebastien helian (talk) 17:48, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. Is there some other "conceptual proliferation" that we're disambiguating from? Otherwise I would oppose this move as unnecessary disambiguation. Jenks24 (talk) 07:32, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Conceptual Proliferation Nanananda’s interpretation is based on Anatha.Is it not possible to use discriminative and discursive thoughts while making perceptual process (unrelated to Anatha)? M K Mani muttappillil (talk) 12:33, 19 April 2020 (UTC)