Talk:Porter station/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: D'SuperHero (talk · contribs) 05:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Will review it. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 05:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Lead
Seems fine but the words "rapid" and "deepest" must be reworded. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 08:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Partly done I've wikilinked rapid transit which has a specific meaning. What's wrong with "deepest"? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- History
Good work with this section and other subsections in it but keep limited images to the section as it gets difficulty in reading.
- Done I've removed one image. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Arts on the line
Fair work.
- Accessibility
Good one, needs bit elongation.
- Not done: I'm not sure what else there is to add here. Suggestions? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Bus connections
Fine but needs a touchup to some.
- Not done What changes are you looking for? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- References and External links
No deadlinks found. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 14:01, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
Passing it as a Good Article. Can be made more better further but as for now its eligible as a GA according to the work by its nominator. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 11:58, 14 January 2016 (UTC)