Talk:Ethnic party

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Ethnic groups Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Ethnic party be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

removal of non-justified "expert" banner

This article exists since july 2005, an anonymous contributor placed on january 7th a banner asking for an expert advice on it, without any justification in the discussion page. I therefore removed the banner. --Pylambert 10:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Flemish 'Kartel'

A user suppressed the words Flemish 'Kartel' for municipal elections in Brussels, I disagree: on several occasions several Flemish parties bundled forces on 'Vlaams Kartel' lists for municipal elections in Brussels (see nl:Vlaams kartel). As these parties are quite obviously minority parties in every Brussels municipality, i.e. the parties of an ethnic or linguistic minority (in the average 15% of the population), this is indeed a case of an electoral coalition of ethnic parties. There were such Kartel lists in Sint-Lambrechts-Woluwe in 1976 [1] and 1982 [2], in Oudergem in 1976 [3], 1982 [4] and 1988 [5], in Anderlecht in 1988 [6], in Etterbeek in 1976 [7], 1982 [8] and 1988 [9], in Sint-Gillis in 1976 [10], 1982 [11], in Sint-Joost-ten-Node in 1982 [12]. --Pylambert 21:55, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fiji

Deleted POV again. Keep it off. Fiji does have 46 out of 71 seats ethnically reserved, but if that makes it "the most extreme case", you'd better source that claim as per Wikipedia policy, or else I'll keep on removing it.

BTW, the ethnic reservation of seats has not prevented multiracial parties from playing a vigorous role in the past. The [Alliance Party (Fiji)]] which ruled from 1970 to 1987 was multiracial (it had more support among Fijians to be sure, but also attracted up to 25 percent of the Indian vote), and the Fiji Labour Party was multiracial until Tupeni Baba left, with most of his Fijian supporters, in 2001. At the 1999 election, the FLP and its allies had won a majority of the seats; its power baswe was the Indian constituencies but several Fijians were elected on its ticket, and its Fijian ally, the Fijian Association Party, won a number of Fijian reserved seats.

I repeat: if you're going to claim that Fiji is the most extreme case of ethnic politics, you'd jolly well better be prepared to source that claim. "The most extreme" is a very POV expression, and Wikipedia will not tolerate it without substantiation. David Cannon 03:52, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the mention of the Fijian situation, without "most extreme case", even if I still consider that a combination of ethnic allocation of a majority of seats and of ethnic parties (even if all parties are not ethnic) makes it the most extreme case nowadays. The whole article is very clearly neutral and scientific, extreme doesn't have a negative meaning, I don't understand your problem with that adjective but I am not a native English speaker, I guess you know better. --Pylambert 10:31, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, inbetween the problem has been solved. Thank you. --Pylambert 10:33, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Who counts as "minorities?" This list is only about ethnic minorities, so it should either be renamed Political parties of ethnic minorities (or somesuch), or it should be expanded to include other kinds of minorities (e.g. linguistic, religious, etc.). -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 14:13, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

original research tag

If the whole article is original research (actually, it looks more like an attempt towards a typology of political parties of minorities), shouldn't the whole content be removed and replaced by a stub on the same topics ? What is the purpose of tagging articles without trying at least to improve them ? --Minorities observer (talk) 07:54, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Political parties of minorities. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.wz-berlin.de/zkd/dsl/pdf/Enduring-ethnicity.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060913025014/http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/kokkalis/GSW7/Biziouras%20_paper_.pdf to http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/kokkalis/GSW7/Biziouras%20_paper_.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://bss.sfsu.edu/ir/irjournal/WinterSpring01/BenjaminRogus.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:27, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]