Talk:Piano Sonata No. 3 (Beethoven)

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.

Untitled

I'm removing the "citation needed" after the sentence that refers to the "numerous demanding piano techniques." No authority is needed, in my opinion; this is a simple fact. 129.79.132.127 (talk) 18:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Piano Sonata No. 1 (Beethoven) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 13:15, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note the date of the foregoing notice. The discussion, now long closed, concerned whether to move the sonata articles to new titles incorporating opus numbers. The conclusion was not to do so. Drhoehl (talk) 23:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stub

Who else thinks this article has enough sufficient content to not be considered a stub? I think it's long enough to be not considered one. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 06:18, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Other than the boiler plate movement list, external links and template there's very little else. Expansion of the article would help. What's the rush to remove the tag? Most readers don't notice the stub tags, its mainly to encourage expansion from editors.DavidRF (talk) 14:52, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then let's expand it. --Bryce (talk |

contribs) 05:35, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I signed up to contribute to this page. The analysis seems to be based upon original research and contains a lot of vague phrasing so best perhaps to start there. What kind of analysis is expected on this kind of page?Liccposting (talk) 21:56, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unverifiable Information

I can't verify the sentence 'Some believed Beethoven was influenced here by the Weiner ideals of expressionism.' in the section about the first movement. This sentence was also vandalized and also starts with a vague attribution. Can someone find the source and deal with the beginning of the sentence? JamesC101 (talk) 15:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]