Talk:Microsoft Phoenix

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 April 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Microsoft Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 11 May 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 00:29, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenix (compiler framework) → Microsoft Phoenix – The proposed target uses natural disambiguation, which is preferred. Reliable sources cited in the article refer to the subject as both "Phoenix" and "Microsoft Phoenix". — Newslinger talk 01:10, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support: The existing name does not work too well, is and is clouding google search results for other things. The proposed title is unambiguous (hopefully). I've not checked but the sources using just Phoenix probably have already filtered the context to Microsoft. Overall a good suggestion for the reasons given by the nominator.Djm-leighpark (talk) 06:09, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support The only reason people find it is because it's a Microsoft project (extinct now). Natural disambiguation is a better choice. --qedk (t 桜 c) 22:22, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.